Esculenta

Linnaean Herbarium

I just finished reading the lead, and I must say, you have done well! I look forward to reading the entire article. It's hard to believe we didn't have one already! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 01:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I was also surprised that we didn't have an article on this. I general, I think it would benefit the encyclopedia to have more articles on herbaria. Esculenta (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

I agree! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 04:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

This discussion has led me to add another side project to my already massive to-do list, thanks :) ... ChatGPT has assured me that these are the ten most notable herbaria with sufficient existing literature to create substantial articles. Esculenta (talk) 05:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh my. Umm, you're welcome?

Some of these might be embedded within the articles of their parent institutions.

These may help (or hurt): List of herbaria, List of herbaria in Europe, List of herbaria in Oceania, List of herbaria in North America, and List of herbaria in Turkey.

I'd like to see an article on TORCH – The Texas Oklahoma Regional Consortium of Herbaria. It has what I have found to be a very useful data portal. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Linnaean Herbarium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Linnaean Herbarium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Linnaean Herbarium

The article Linnaean Herbarium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Linnaean Herbarium for comments about the article, and Talk:Linnaean Herbarium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kew Herbarium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kew Herbarium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kew Herbarium

The article Kew Herbarium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kew Herbarium for comments about the article, and Talk:Kew Herbarium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

RE: Drepanolejeunea senticosa collection date

Hi there! Excellent work on Drepanolejeunea senticosa, I hope you don't mind the formatting changes I've made. It's great to see another person interested in liverworts! I just wanted to reach out to discuss the collection date for the D. senticosa type specimen - you had it listed in the article as 1860, however, on reading Bischler's description I could find no mention of when the type was collected (she lists it as s.d., "without date"). I've removed it for now, but if you can remember where you found 1860 mentioned please feel free to put it back. Thanks for your hard work, looking forward to reading the other articles you've expanded :) Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I found the source I got that date from and added it back. I'm mostly a lichen person, but have recently decided I should learn more about the other cryptogams that are lurking when I'm looking for lichens. I'll be switching over to peat mosses for the next batch of plant stub expansions. Esculenta (talk) 06:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Graphis neeladriensis

The article Graphis neeladriensis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only based on predatory publishers, not reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)