Fa suisse
Welcome!
edit
|
April 2017
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Central European University has been reverted.
Your edit here to Central European University was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/hirtv/videos/vb.345496092135627/1466361190049106/?type=2&theater) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hello! Fa suisse,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 10:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yascha Mounk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of WikiIndex
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on WikiIndex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 00:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiIndex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiIndex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 08:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African-American studies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Fa suisse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Nikkei cuisine.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global warming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Populist leaders has been nominated for discussion
edit Category:Populist leaders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Jan-Werner Müller
editHello, Fa suisse,
Thank you for creating Jan-Werner Müller.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
It's less that the external links don't follow policy and more that the External links section needs its format fixed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
"WikiIndex" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikiIndex. Since you had some involvement with the WikiIndex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Black (human racial classification) has been nominated for renaming
edit Category:Black (human racial classification), which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Jesse Lile
editHi Fa Suisse. Can you please add some context to your addition here? Who is Jesse Lile? What's his area of expertise? Tell us readers why his opinion is important (i.e. he's a sociologist or enthnologist economist or whatever). MeegsC (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing my attention to this, MeegsC; I would likely have missed your remark on the talk page. I have just added some background regarding Jesse Lile, Kelefa Sanneh and Helen Pluckrose. Fa suisse (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Violence and controversies during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Warning
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments. El_C 10:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- You are obviously referring to [1]. I removed the section precisely because it did not constitute legitimate talk page comments, but snark which adds nothing to the (already lively) conversation. I was thus reverting an act of vandalism (the first time unintentionally). Furthermore, my reply has been deleted too (by User:JzG, obviously as a form of retaliation. I thus reverted two acts of vandalism. Fa suisse (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Negative, you do not take it upon yourself to decide whether comments made by editors in good standing are legitimate. And calling those comments vandalism is a personal attack — see what vandalism is not. Again, if you continue with the disruption, you will be sanctioned. El_C 10:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Your wording ("legitimate talk page comments") seems to imply that some comments can be removed. I see no specific reference to snarky/provocative comments as not vandalism, and by the way, my (separate, and legitimate) comments were removed by User:JzG and by yourself, violating the rule of conduct you just mentioned. Fa suisse (talk) 10:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- When you insert a comment without also at the same time removing other editors' comments, then and only then will your submissions be allowed to be retained. El_C 10:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- It was not at the same time. My reply, my (intentional) deletion of the section, Jzg's "revert". Fa suisse (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Also, there was no personal attack: I "attacked" the edit, not the user, and the policy page does not mention accusations of vandalism as personal attacks. Fa suisse (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it is. Not all policy is written. And if you're not going to respect the textual integrity for the comments of other editors, expect other editors to show you the same discourtesy. El_C 10:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I admit to having placed the integrity of the talk page's content above the textual integrity of a random snarky section. Fa suisse (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Again, that is not for you to decide. You are an involved editor, not an uninvolved admin like myself. El_C 11:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I admit to having placed the integrity of the talk page's content above the textual integrity of a random snarky section. Fa suisse (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it is. Not all policy is written. And if you're not going to respect the textual integrity for the comments of other editors, expect other editors to show you the same discourtesy. El_C 10:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- When you insert a comment without also at the same time removing other editors' comments, then and only then will your submissions be allowed to be retained. El_C 10:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Your wording ("legitimate talk page comments") seems to imply that some comments can be removed. I see no specific reference to snarky/provocative comments as not vandalism, and by the way, my (separate, and legitimate) comments were removed by User:JzG and by yourself, violating the rule of conduct you just mentioned. Fa suisse (talk) 10:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Negative, you do not take it upon yourself to decide whether comments made by editors in good standing are legitimate. And calling those comments vandalism is a personal attack — see what vandalism is not. Again, if you continue with the disruption, you will be sanctioned. El_C 10:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Robin DiAngelo
edit- Just here to put it on the record that this subtle revert at Robin DiAngelo could be read in good faith under different circumstances, but given the context of Fa suisse's other editing it might be an attempt at silently avoiding discussion at Talk:Robin DiAngelo#Reception section and hoping that other editors won't notice. — Bilorv (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hey, first of all, and most importantly, this was not a stealth edit. My edit summary : (→Education and career: diversity training : criticism by Pamela Newkirk in her book, and by JC Pan in article) could not be more explicit, in fact. So please do not make such an allegation. Seond, I must say that I did not remember any discussion about this specific content, but rather about the general merits of a WP:CSECTION, which is now gone and which I am not attempting to reinstate. I have now checked the talk page for references to Newkirk's book and JC Pan's comments and there is indeed a mention, by you, of Newkirk's book. I somehow missed it: sorry and my bad. But I'd like to emphasize that you shouldn't imply that I'm trying to go "under the radar" without anything solid to it, especially given the very explicit edit summary (mentioning by name the author of a book and the nature of added content ("criticism")) and my previously frank engagement with you on the talk page. Again, this was clearly not a stealth edit. Fa suisse (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Blockchain and cryptocurrency general sanctions notification
edit | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Important message
edit| | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The American Promise moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, The American Promise, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The American Promise
edit Hello, Fa suisse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The American Promise, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:South African male activists has been nominated for merging
edit Category:South African male activists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:African diasporas in the Americas
edit A tag has been placed on Category:African diasporas in the Americas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jean-Philippe Aumasson
edit Hello, Fa suisse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Philippe Aumasson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jean-Philippe Aumasson
edit Hello, Fa suisse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-Philippe Aumasson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Economic base (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)