Serial Number 54129

Articles seeking peer review
before featured article candidacy

• May 30 Chinese characters
• June 6 Jenna Ortega
• July 29 Beebo the God of War
• August 2 Dexter's Laboratory
• August 15 1939 Liechtenstein putsch
• August 23 River
• August 26 Tropical Storm Kai-tak
• August 29 Ivan the Terrible (1945 film)
• September 3 A Space for the Unbound
• September 17 Lock's Quest
• September 27 Pearl (X)
• September 28 Tesla Model S
• September 30 Lake Michigan Monster
• October 4 Cisnormativity
• October 16 Veiqia
• October 19 Virtual Self (EP)
• October 21 Crohn's Disease
• October 22 Stingless bee
• October 23 Austin J. Tobin Plaza
• October 29 William D. Hoard
• October 29 Andrea Navagero
• October 30 Mind
• November 3 Bejeweled (video game)
• November 5 James Scott (boxer)
• November 11 Gerald Durrell
• November 11 Snooze (song)

Unanswered peer reviews

"We're all going on a summer holiday!"

You just stay around to keep the tools, you just stay around to keep the tools! You think that we're all fools, you just stay around to keep the tools! Making minute edits every year, you make minute edits every year! We can see it's very clear, you make minute edits every year! Users such as yourself who make a significantly low amount of edits just to keep your administrative tools sicken me and many others. Just give up the tools already!!! What are you holding on to them for anyways!! What a selfish thing to do!!

Possibly "this troll, who uses Aberdeen IP's" per User:Shro23, to Master Jay in June 2020.

In Praise of David Gerard

And WP:Reliable Sources.

This page was last edited or modified by Muaza Husni (talk).

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For literally being a special editor and a source of inspiration to me for four solid years and counting. Celestina007 (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		I would like to thank you and User:Levivich for you help on Fielding L. Wright back in 2020. Sorry for taking so long to give you a barnstar. Jon698 (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Cheers Jon698; it was Levivich who did all the "heavy lifting", actually helping you—I just did a slow burn in the corner. Mind you, did I send you a bunch of books? Anyway, the article's looking dead good. Good work! ——Serial 18:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing

On 13 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the taxi driver in the Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing was later commended for "incredible presence of mind and bravery"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

• Hey, cool. But I basically just wrote the original article; many moons ago I realised that any article put forward for ITN would be taken over, not so much by gatekeepers, but by trivialistas and this hasn't proved me wrong. Still, collectivism is the name of the day!  :) SN54129 06:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines

On 1 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1354, the Duke of Lancaster compared his heart to the sea, a fox's hole, and a market-place? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Epic Barnstar
		I'm giving you this barnstar in recognition of your impressive expansion of Concordat of Worms. I'm glad to see someone share my interest in this very deserving topic. Thank you! Modussiccandi (talk) 21:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Wonderful Parliament

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Wonderful Parliament, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

February songs

in friendship

Promotion of Robert de Umfraville

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Robert de Umfraville, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Buidhe (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your tireless efforts to ensure that Battle of Poitiers is adequately referenced. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 1937 tour of Germany by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. — Bilorv (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of John Minsterworth

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, John Minsterworth, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Dennis Waterman

On 9 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dennis Waterman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Serial Number 54129! Your work on Óengus I has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Richard Roose

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Richard Roose, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 01:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Subhead format, outstanding use of

Just wanted to give an admiring thumbs-up for your subheads for Index, A History of the. Bravo! Flaggingwill (talk) 16:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Because we care. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Order of Brothelyngham

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Order of Brothelyngham, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

• omg congrats!!! Lourdes 10:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

  In this case, I think 'omg' must stand for 'oh my gog'  :) SN54129 18:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

thanks

much Elinruby (talk) 11:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between January and March 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

ITN recognition for Shane MacGowan

On 30 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shane MacGowan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Thomas de la More

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Thomas de la More, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!
	Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus! Cheers SchroCat (talk) 09:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Sex Pistols FAR

Hi, long time no talk. I think you are being waited for here for a sign off. Hope all is well, no news here except that Damo Suzuki died yesterday so I am sad. Here is a tune in return [1]. Ceoil (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Ceoil I must've let that drop away. Yes, shame about Damo. Hope he had enough Vitamin C! Good tune that... Bring on the CAN-style drum solos. :) ——Serial 11:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Surprised to read that he spent a few weeks in Ireland before absconding to Cologne. <raises a pint of Guinness to me could have been mucker. RIP>. Ceoil (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Just played Yard Act three times on the trot. Fckn hell they're a rattling bunch! Great find. ——Serial 11:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah same here, they are amazing, that bass sound...and the vocal trawl...wow. This is a top ten of all time favourite [2]. Ceoil (talk) 11:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Brothelyngham

Absolutely terrific stuff. Well done! DBaK (talk) 08:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Tommy Wood (International Brigades)

On 3 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tommy Wood (International Brigades), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irish International Brigader Tommy Wood had only been in Spain for 18 days when he was killed at the Battle of Lopera during the Spanish Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tommy Wood (International Brigades). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tommy Wood (International Brigades)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– Hilst [talk] 20:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Slates, Slags and Tapes, live

From what have heard the sound is way better than on the original ep. [3] Preview Ceoil (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the red alert Ceoil, I guess I'm hardwired to pre-order that  :) There are some good boots from that era, I wonder if they've polished one up fo this? I mean, Grant Showbiz used to do it for his own personal pension fund! ——Serial Number 54129 15:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

From the previews, I would have selected different boots. Was disappointing at the choices for "Leave the Capitol" and "Middle Mass"; would have gone for the 2nd night in Reykjavik 1981 recordings myself,[4] but guess he (ie Steve Hanley) had to think about fidelity as it is mostly a vinyl release. [shrug]. At least its good to see the band finally making money from re-releases, considering all the awful contracts Mark signed them up to in the 90s when he was short on cash. Ceoil (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

ps, Fall type bass heavy tunes are going through a revival in last three years....skip to 4:17 here for the best of the bunch. What an incredible drummer. Ceoil (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Your username is absolutely incredible. Full marks from me. Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 15:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks LunaEatsTuna, but it involved absolutely no imagination on my part. Why do you have 'Template' in your sig. ——Serial Number 54129 17:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

After several valid complaints, I have since changed it. ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), we do what we must because we can – posted at 17:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Well, OK, but it seems a lot of fuss about nothing. Who gets into a long dance over templates. More power on your tax evasion, btw. ——Serial Number 54129 17:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Thomas Neville (died 1460)

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Thomas Neville (died 1460), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Congrats - great work! Hchc2009 (talk) 17:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Hchc2009 for the kind words—and also nice to see you pop back in every now and again. Your medieval presence is much missed; I learned much from you when merely a noob, and there weren't many medievalists around. To be honest, there might be even less now. Fancy writing up Thomas' final battle together? :) ——Serial Number 54129 17:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
909		Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York (talk)	Add sources
293		Battle of Tewkesbury (talk)	Add sources
40		Katherine Neville, Baroness Hastings (talk)	Add sources
22		Remember... Dreams Come True (talk)	Add sources
44		Edmund Beaufort (died 1471) (talk)	Add sources
131		Jumeirah Lake Towers (talk)	Add sources
55		John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu (talk)	Cleanup
66		Holy See–Israel relations (talk)	Cleanup
595		Football hooliganism (talk)	Cleanup
19		Kieran Fleming (talk)	Expand
245		Political history of the United Kingdom (1979–present) (talk)	Expand
1,500		Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (talk)	Expand
181		Adrian Mole (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,387		Right-wing populism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
108		Talking animals in fiction (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,257		Free and open-source software (talk)	Merge
1,401		Open-source software (talk)	Merge
70		Media of Canada (talk)	Merge
45		Richard Scrope (bishop) (talk)	Wikify
607		Little Caesars (talk)	Wikify
5		Kyriakos Dourekas (talk)	Wikify
2		Keith Dale Gordon (talk)	Orphan
17		Zapp Electric Vehicles (talk)	Orphan
2		Carey Short Line (talk)	Orphan
9		Jayalath Weerakkody (talk)	Stub
2		Vaskino, Mezhdurechensky District, Vologda Oblast (talk)	Stub
26		Eleanor Neville, Countess of Northumberland (talk)	Stub
6		Donald Perera (talk)	Stub
5		Lambingan (talk)	Stub
102		Bernadette Sands McKevitt (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Page name query

Hi there SN. I don't know if we've had the pleasure, but I've been aware of your prolific work for some time. Do you think the White Ship page ought to be named something like "White Ship disaster"? It has always struck me as odd that the title is merely the ship. Particularly strange since we have the Victims of the White Ship disaster article. Aza24 (talk) 01:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Aza24, hi, I've seen you around FAC, I think? Thanks for the note, and I must apologise for my tardiness in replying. I'm afraid I have a memory like a sieve nowadays  :) I think you're prright, actually. To me, an article on a ship should be about the ship as a whole to which any disaster (say) is just a portion. I guess Titanic and Sinking of the Titanic is a similar example, if a far larger/more notable one. But for a medieval ship, there's only so much we can ever know about its order, construction, launch, victualing, crewing, ownership, voyages, etc., and where, like the White ship, the most notable event by far is its sinking, that's what the article focuses on, and of course, the article title should reflect the article itself. Per the principle of least astonishment, if the article is called the White Ship, then the reader will expect an article about the ship; likewise, if an article is called White Ship disaster, then they will know that when they click the link, they will find an article about the sinking rather than the boat itself. And as you say, that's already accepted logic in the Victims of article—that the disaster is effectively the primary topic.SerialNumber54129 15:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

PS, if you happen to be around FAC these days, I've got something there at the moment, although if it bores you to tears, that's pretty understandable  :) thanks for looking in again! SerialNumber54129 15:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the thoughtful response! I've started a discussion, incorporating some of your feedback, at Talk:White Ship#Requested move 7 September 2024 – Aza24 (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

• News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked

• In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?

• Recent research: Simulated Wikipedia seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment

• News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election

• Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024

• Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year

• Traffic report: After the gold rush

• Humour: Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

September music

story · music · places

Thank you for your comments in the FAC, - I replied now, - interesting aspect! - Today's story has 3 composers, I couldn't decide for the one on the Main page or the one who didn't make it on his bicentenary, so took both, and the pic has a third. Listen if you have a bit of time. The music, played by the Kyiv Symphony Orchestra in Germany in April 2022, impressed me. - To celebrate the day, I listened to Bruckner's Eighth on radio, conducted by Dennis Russell Davies. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Three stories related to today in memory, 11 September, 20 July and 20 June, the latter piece of art also pictured on the Main page. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, look! A talk page!

Re. this diff.

Just thought it would be easier to discuss this on your talk than through edit summaries. If you think the close should be updated/corrected/whatever you should probably ask WereSpielChequers if that's what they would prefer. Primefac (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Very funny Primefac. Of course, you're absolutely right. And I no way meant to suggest trolling or anything like that. Merely a gentle... digging out, perhaps. Of the kind that Fram's probably used to by now. And probably doesn't care about. Because if he did, he wouldn't be where he is today. I guess I just don't like being thought of as stupid. I remember WSC from the London meetups, funnily enough, where—and I hope this isn't OUTING!—I seem to recall him regularly getting stuck into the famed Wetherspoon's mixed grill  :) I hope he's still enjoying them! SerialNumber54129 14:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm still a regular at the London meetup, but can't remember when I last ordered the mixed grill. When Mrs WSC discovered that the low cholesterol level I was such a martyr to was from a 1989 test she made me get it measured again. These days we have good and bad cholesterol and its the just the good cholesterol that I have a low level of. Spoons being known for their beer rather than their food I have a number of choices on their menu that I'm unlikely to try again, so nowadays it is the Mandalorian curry if I'm feeling virtuous or the steak and kidney pudding if I'm feeling that I've been healthy in my last month's dining. As for the close, it was near unanimous, and I thought I was paying respect to that as opposed to simply saying successful. ϢereSpielChequers 16:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Poor ole Spicy, not getting the regal treatment even with his self-nom'd higher-by-eleven !votes result  ;) The Mandalorian curry sounds like something out of the Star Wars franchise (from the cantina, perhaps!), but you can't beat a proper pudding all day long. That's pretty much off, and continues to be off, the menu for me, too. Back on topic, though, WereSpielChequers, I now see that Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent uses a Greater-than sign; that's new, isn't it? Anything to do with this edit? (@Primefac too.) SerialNumber54129 16:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Huh, that seems a bit silly, quibbling over 99 and 99.X% Surprised I never noticed it before. Primefac (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that means I've been inconsistent. Hopefully I will be consistent for the future, unless of course anyone objects to the change. No comment re the template. ϢereSpielChequers 18:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

@WereSpielChequers: Well, I'm sure interested parties will be observing keenly for future consistency. I recommend gelatin. Cheers! SerialNumber54129 13:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Closing of a move request

Your this closing of a move request on Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama appears to have done without considering sources whereas you apparently considered the opinion of a single disruptive editor on the subject having a conflict of interest on it. It might be worth talking a look at this discussion also. So what remedy need to be made? Neutralhappy (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Well, interesting... @Spworld2: are you a disruptive user? Please desist if so. Or is this a broader misunderstanding between two pretty experienced editors, underpinned by differing operating philosophies? SerialNumber54129 11:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed. We plan to use the following schedule: Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections. If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Came across Index, A History of the today. I was extremely charmed by the section headers, and further delighted to see that it was your work. Thanks for keeping Wikipedia weird ;) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Premeditated Chaos thanks for the message! (First time, apparently!) Yes, it was good fun doing; and a dead good read too, if bizarre minuscule is a favoured genre (not that it even is a genre, but). I'd like to have taken it further—I've collected a shed load of respectable reviews, etc in the years since, but I suspect that'll be the point when it gets stripped of anything fun  :) if you know what I mean. It's a shame though, cos the book deserves to be promoted in anti-G11/NOTPROMO way. I hope you're well! I had a look for the Paper article you were after, but they don't even seem to have an archive of their own? Let alone anywhere else. Did you have any joy? SerialNumber54129 17:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm well, hope you are also :) Shame about the Paper article, but it's so common with mid-90s magazines. It's really awful to think of how much cultural output has been lost for lack of digital archiving.

I do like unusual reading, so I've popped Index on my library list. Can't say you're promoting it if it's all paid for by the king's money, right? I know how you feel wrt that level of "professionalising" kind of stripping the fun out, but I can't imagine it not at least being GA-able without losing the good stuff. (And, you know...I do do GA reviews, should you ever decide to pull the trigger on it.) Cheers! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

About the conclusions reached in my RFC

May I ask how the summary of the conclusions reached “RfC that is not an RfC”, here.In this discussion,two editors thought this was not RFC. Two editors (including me) thought editorial synthesis of published material implied a new conclusion. I think there is no consensus was reached here for now. I request you to review this discussion and reconsider this procedural close. If final conclusion is still “closing it”, the reason “no consensus was reached” is much acceptable for me.--Kof2102966 (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Because there is no reply in 5 days, I decided to appeal. No offence, I just couldn't wait so long, it doesn't mean I try to accuse you of anything.Kof2102966 (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

"T:QB" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect T:QB has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 15 § T:QB until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
188		Little Barrie (talk)	Add sources
60		Takanini (talk)	Add sources
94		Ruairí Ó Brádaigh (talk)	Add sources
36		Battle of Hexham (talk)	Add sources
101		Ramblin' Gamblin' Man (talk)	Add sources
278		George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence (talk)	Add sources
24		Northern campaign (Irish Republican Army) (talk)	Cleanup
111		Epping, Essex (talk)	Cleanup
282		Genre fiction (talk)	Cleanup
1,389		Illegal immigration to the United States (talk)	Expand
462		Real Irish Republican Army (talk)	Expand
7,426		Israeli–Palestinian conflict (talk)	Expand
166		The Mystery of the Blue Train (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
43		Brycheiniog (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		History of crime fiction (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9,763		State of Palestine (talk)	Merge
789		Occupied Palestinian territories (talk)	Merge
28		Magnox Ltd (talk)	Merge
35		Effects of immigration to the United States (talk)	Wikify
4,603		Gnosticism (talk)	Wikify
41		Martin Edwards (author) (talk)	Wikify
3		Brian Wirth (talk)	Orphan
2		Baird Cove (talk)	Orphan
2		Anna Kisil (talk)	Orphan
14		Amazon Coins (talk)	Stub
156		2024 Cricket World Cup Challenge League A (Kenya) (talk)	Stub
10		Nikos Goulandris (talk)	Stub
12		Meols Cop (talk)	Stub
2		2022 United Arab Emirates Tri-Nation Series (round 9) (talk)	Stub
5		Rowman & Littlefield Award in Innovative Teaching (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

• In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

• Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

• Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics

• Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing

• News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?

• Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia?

• Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors

• Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Act of Accord

Congratulations, Serial Number 54129! The article you nominated, Act of Accord, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Congratulations! - You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy whatever you celebrate today, - more who died, more to come, and they made the world richer. Greetings from Madrid where I took the pic of assorted Cucurbita in 2016. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Count of admin actions

Regarding this edit: I think you meant to say ~150 logged admin actions? isaacl (talk) 23:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Isaacl, yes,now adjusted. Cheers! SerialNumber54129 23:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

GA

Humorless self-indulgence, be the order of the day.

See: this GA review, GA reviewer demanding copies of printed sources and User page. You've got your way - I won't take part in the GA process or any discussions about the GA process - so why are you twisting the knife? If you don't have the power to ban me from the GA process like you claim, THEN HOW ON EARTH have you the right to demand that I am not allowed to post on my own user page, or to demand that I "get back to work". What "work" am I allowed to do? Who gets to decide it? Are you trying to drive me off the project - if so you are doing a good job of it. I don't want to continue this discussion, so please don't.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

'Begone, I say. The gods have heard me swear'.

Although thinking about it, continuing a discussion on someone's talk page is an odd way of 'not wanting to continue' a discussion that Nigel Ish started in by now *checks notes* two other venues, and has now also taken to Users:Kyteto's and Thebiguglyalien's talk pages, ywo completely inoffensive editors who have somehow earned Nigel Ish's ire. Or perhaps not enough people were paying him attention. SerialNumber54129 18:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, Serial Number 54129. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Vanderwaalforces
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Waldorf

Hey, I've just noticed that when you edited the lead photo for Shooting of Stephen Waldorf you uploaded it to Commons but it's a fair use image. Could you re-upload it locally? Just copy and paste this onto the description page (dug up from the deleted file that was used before):

==Summary== {{Non-free use rationale 2 |Description = Side-by-side composite photograph of David Martin (left) and Stephen Waldorf (right), taken c. 1983. Waldorf was shot by police officers who mistook him for Martin. |Source = '''Original publication''': media photo, presumably published in print in 1983<br/> '''Immediate source''': http://westhampsteadlife.com/2016/09/07/they-shot-the-wrong-man/17751 |Date = c. 1983 |Author = Unknown |Article = Shooting of Stephen Waldorf |Purpose = for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of their biographical article |Replaceability = Of the two subjects, neither was a public figure or likely to have been freely photographed prior to the incident for which they are notable. One has been deceased since 1984 and the other is not a public figure or somebody who is likely to be widely photographed. Additionally, the appearance of both subjects in 1983 is important for side-by-side comparison and any free image that may exist or could be created could not represent what these people looked like at the time of the incident for which they are notable. |Minimality = The image will be used in one article only and will be the only image of these individuals used in that article. The full view of both subjects' faces is necessary for side-by-side comparison, which is the purpose of its use. |Commercial = The incident took place in 1983 so the image has been publicly available for 40 years at the time of upload. Commercial opportunities are likely to be limited for an image of two people only notable for their involvement in a single incident such a long time ago. |Other information = The subject of the photograph has been deceased since: 1984 }} ==Licensing== {{Non-free biog-pic|Shooting of Stephen Waldorf}}

Then we can arrange deletion of the Commons file and we won't get caught out on TFA day! Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks HJ Mitchell, have I done everything now. It is deleted on Commons (although some character called Taivo moaned about it all the same. No pleasing some people!), and I re-upped it locally with that FUR and put it back in the article. Did I miss anything?

Ah the good old days, when we used to work together :D cheers! SerialNumber54129 13:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes, as far as I can tell we're all good now. Thanks! Cute doggies, btw. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

This sounds like somebody makes a crime, policeman catches him and he says about that: no pleasing some people! Taivo (talk) 09:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
• October 22–24 - Discussion phase
• October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
• The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Move of essay

I notice that you have made a series of edits related to undoing my move of my personal essay to Wikipedia:How to increase Wikipedia's credibility. No consensus is required for the creation of essays or for moving them from personal user space to Wikipedia's project space where non-personal essays are housed. I have done this many times since 2003 and never encountered anything like what you've done. Is there some new policy I'm unaware of? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129: Please undo what you have done. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

INSEAD

Hi @Serial Number 54129, Differentspin (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC).

I understand that you are concerned with promotional content being added to the article, however I have made an effort to only add back content that is not promotional.

If the problem is too many references to INSEAD's website these can be changed.

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to the Troubles. This is a standard message to inform you that the Troubles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours in this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. SerialNumber54129 16:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Are you okay?

What is going on? Are you feeling well? You just posted a notice to your own page and you are refusing to reply to my request above. This is strange behavior. Should I contact ArbCom or ANI? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

The self-CTOP notice was them testing the fix I made to a CTOP notification script at their request; see Wikipedia:User_scripts/Requests#User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/arb. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Writ Keeper, yes, Valjean, no need to panic! I thought I was probably due a timely reminder not to shill for Ian Paisley Jr or the UDA  :) SerialNumber54129 16:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Whew! That's good. Fortunately there is a good natural explanation. Thanks. Also, please address my concerns above. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

William de Ros, 6th Baron Ros scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 1 November 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Serial Number 54129. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Sincerely, Dilettante 20:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry Dilettante, I wouldn't know  :) but there seems to be a modicum of... interpretative differentialsm to the hypothesis. That's why I prefer to stick to simpler concepts, like hypocrisy. Thanks though! SerialNumber54129 20:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

No problem! It was clearly a good faith mistake, but I thought I should point it out. Sincerely, Dilettante 20:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

(By the way, I don't mean to come off as dismissive—note how I answered your message within minutes whereas that character Valjean has posted here multiple times and never got a satisfactory response. In fact he only got one response, period. "LOL" etc.) SerialNumber54129 20:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

(Also, further apologies are due you as I admit I was referring to the latest round of discussions, in so far as I know of them—I had no idea that happened in July! It's a smoking gun, to be sure. Thanks for that!) SerialNumber54129 20:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikispeak

Hey Serial Number 54129, is Glock wikispeak for a global lock? Saw you using it in a context where that made sense and Glock did not but I hadn't encountered it before so thought I would double check. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Horse Eye's Back, apologies, yes it is. I only use it cos I've seen it used elsewhere before... and laziness of course... but I forgot about the Cypress Hill overtones!  ;) SerialNumber54129 17:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Re:talk page comment

I shouldn’t have to say this, but going to a 3rd-party talk page to post this, referring to a long-dead conflict I had with a different 3rd-party (4th party?) I no longer express any animosity towards, is disruptive. I also should’t have to say that my having business with LB and your having business with LB (which happen to have the same catalyst) does not mean you need to have any business with me. User talk pages are for communicating with their respective users— if you have a problem with me, take it to me directly. Dronebogus (talk) 21:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive my ass. You mean, tell you to take your fucking hypocrisy off elsewhere? My pleasure. SerialNumber54129 21:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Since we’re playing the “dig up bad things from literally years ago” game, can I cite this to prove you’re just as much of a hypocrite? Though your response here isn’t exactly civilized either. Dronebogus (talk) 21:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

If you can't tell the difference, that's up to you. Get nurturing that block log! 🚫 SerialNumber54129 21:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Janet Nelson

On 19 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Janet Nelson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 10:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

• News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning

• Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper

• In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!

• Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South

• Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night

• Book review: The Editors

• Humour: The Newspaper Editors

• Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Issue

I hope that this message finds you well. In one of your entries on a certain Talk page, you alleged that I had engaged in sockpuppetry. I would like to tell you that the admin team had investigated the matter twice and it both vindicated me. For the former instance it was a mis-ban based on the misjudgement of an admin.

Given that such a claim seems very serious in nature, may I humbly ask you to retract your claim and apologise? Steven1991 (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• October 22–24 - Discussion phase
• October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
• November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, Serial Number 54129. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Saqib
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
378		Artistic gymnastics (talk)	Add sources
38		Recurring characters in the Hercule Poirot stories (talk)	Add sources
3,157		Henry IV of England (talk)	Add sources
1,991		Hercule Poirot (talk)	Add sources
245		Arthur Hastings (talk)	Add sources
42		John Talbot, 2nd Earl of Shrewsbury (talk)	Add sources
203		Invasions of the British Isles (talk)	Cleanup
42		History of Colchester (talk)	Cleanup
386		Hosur (talk)	Cleanup
197		Breakfast by country (talk)	Expand
949		Justice and Development Party (Turkey) (talk)	Expand
1,666		Bath, Somerset (talk)	Expand
34		Regional street food (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
210		Gospel of Philip (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,323		Constitution (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Carotenoid biosynthesis (talk)	Merge
184		Hot dog variations (talk)	Merge
1,006		Demographic history of Palestine (region) (talk)	Merge
55		First Sikh State (talk)	Wikify
20,405		Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) (talk)	Wikify
20		German military law (talk)	Wikify
3		Minimal algebra (talk)	Orphan
5		Bodhamayananda (talk)	Orphan
3		Amina Srarfi (talk)	Orphan
2		Jovey (talk)	Stub
5		2021 Namibia Tri-Nation Series (talk)	Stub
3		2022 Papua New Guinea Tri-Nation Series (round 11) (talk)	Stub
68		Thirteen at Dinner (film) (talk)	Stub
504		M Dot R (talk)	Stub
50		Dead Man's Folly (film) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
• November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Marine 69-71/Autographs

JzG hasn't edited the MFD (nor, so far as I'm aware, anything related to M69-71); I think you meant JPxG. Yes, I know you've already struck the comment, but it's still misleading and mildly confusing even so. —Cryptic 17:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

There was me thinking you must be here for my beaux yeux. SerialNumber54129 17:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome!

It's pretty sweet being thanked for my very first edit, over 20 years ago! --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

​I saw your comment about having beeen here two decades. Wow! So I just had to look :) SerialNumber54129 15:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

TFA - de Ros

[5] Gog the Mild (talk) 22:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Gog, have replied. Will go over it tomorrow. Tut. Some people obviously think I write my own blurbs  :) SerialNumber54129 23:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Surely everyone knows that you just supervise and have a team for the more lowly tasks? Gog the Mild (talk) 11:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you today for William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros, introduced (in 2018): "Here's a thing, a rare thing: possibly a genuinely nice feller from the English middle ages; certainly one historian has described him—near as dammit—as being the only honest man of his era. And yet, you will (not!) be surprised to hear, in the words of Edmund Blackadder, for all his goodness, he still managed to make a "fat pile of cash" out of the King he was so loyal to ... and who was himself almost permanently broke!" --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Richard Roose

Ey up. RR is provisionally scheduled for a TFA slot in December. Fancy having a go at a blurb? Gog the Mild (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Richard Roose

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 December 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

RFA

Please keep the back and forth of a personal nature to user talk pages. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Absolutely, from now on 💯 SerialNumber54129 00:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topic template

I am not understanding your reasoning for templating me then? What contetious topic have I been editing? Thanks. The Blue Rider 17:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your lack of response and the bellow personal attack on another oppose just demonstrates that you did template me again in bad faith for no good reason. The Blue Rider 02:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:CTOP alerts are no-fault informational alerts to let you know that you have made an edit in a contentious topic. BLPs are a contentious topic, and you have edited them. You can see here that I've given thousands of such alerts. They do not imply a problem with your behavior, and exist just to let you know the expanded enforcement in the topic area. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you ScottishFinnishRadish for fielding this far more politelty than I would have; I would also note that, since the answer to The Blue Rider's fucking question is literally contained within the CTOP template, the fact that they felt they had to come here and dig me out over it indiates either trolling or a WP:CIR problem. Still, hopefully they've learned their lesson: their deleted talk page messages are a delight. (Although whatever GiantSnowman might say, TBR's edit-summary of "fuck off" was actually not unreasonable, as has been established in the past.) SerialNumber54129 14:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you please not?

I'm about to go to bed, so would to be so kind as to revert this rather than making me revert the needless antagonism? I'd really appreciate it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and reverted. RFA isn't the place to antagonize or needle other editors. You've already made your point, and continuing is just attacking another editor with no result other than increased drama. Please stop. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Thanks for that 20 minute window in which to self-revert. I suggest you were being overly generous. You should have reverted me even sooner. As far as I'm concerned, if someone's making passive aggressive, snide remarks about me ("that editor", "the other editor")—yes, antagonizing me (which didn't occur to you), then they damn well lose a concomitant amount of good faith. In any case it was not an "attack". Unlike, e.g. claims of defamation that were made at the same RfA, and went untouched by the MONITOR. Was that because the MONITOR doesn't mind bollocking ooooordinary editors (and newly-minted admins at that!) but prefers not to revert RoySmith (Grand Vizier of the Revert lol). The MONITOR's absence for that entire talk page discussion was notable! SerialNumber54129 14:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The 20 minute issue was because, as I said, I was going to bed. I was hoping for a quicker turn-around, and failing that I weighed the possibility of waking up to 20 deep nested comments against not having given you enough and decided that just reverting before I fell asleep was the (most) right least wrong best I could do call. As far as what I touched and what I didn't, and what I reverted, and what I asked to be reverted, I'll tell you the same thing I told Tryptofish, It's a difficult position, since I'm a single person trying to use my judgement to act on what the community consensus on what is acceptable. We're all aware that any consensus about what exactly is actionable incivility is pretty shakey, and varies widely based on who shows up to talk about it, and who's actions are being discussed. I'm sorry that I'm not taking the actions you'd like to see, and I mean that with no snark. Just know that I'm trying to moderate the discussion in line with my understanding of what most editors would think is acceptable or unacceptable, and applying that evenly. On top of that, the discussion is about 0.6 tomats right now, so I'm sure things have slipped past my radar. If there is something you want me to look at, just let me know, and I'll try to adequately explain any action I do or don't take regarding it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Recall comment

Hey SN, just noting that it wasn't clear whether your comment at Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Fastily was meant to be a vote or not. It's been changed to a vote several times by editors, and reverted by others, and is now shown as a response under the parent comment/nomination statement. Just wanted to mention this here so that you could clear it if up if necessary. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

And you've now changed it to be a vote, thank you for the clarification. I figured as much, but I just wanted to be clear given the stakes of the petition. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for not answering your ping before, Hey man im josh, I've clarified that it was intended as a signature, and expanded on my reasoning, such as it is. I'm not sure why people got into a tizz about it  :) SerialNumber54129 14:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

• From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon?

• In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel

• Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship

• Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them

• In focus: Questions and answers about the court case

• Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?

• Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK

• Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Second American Revolution

is a redirect leading to itself now. Doug Weller talk 16:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request declined

Hi Serial Number 54129. The Wikipediocracy-related conduct case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC) ==

Graph

Hi, Serial Number 54129 I saw that you made a graph on Only citizens can vote clause US Map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Only_citizens_can_vote_clause_US_Map.png. I was wondering can you update that graph with new states in 2024. South Carolina Oklahoma Wisconsin Missouri Kentucky Idaho And North Carolina Muaza Husni (talk) 07:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)