Gyan.Know

A Kitten For You

Thank's for creating Esports in 2022 Asian Games. While it ticked me off a little cause I was about to publish my version, your's is much better and with more information. Thanks again!

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kraven the Hunter have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kraven the Hunter was changed by Aaditya.abh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866354 on 2021-07-26T14:58:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Dear sir/madam, I don't think my edit in any way was wrong or misleading. I believe it should be reversed. Please look into this. Aaditya.abh (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S8UL Esports

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S8UL Esports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SunDawntalk 07:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, Welcome. Just an advice

Hi aditya, Welcome here, just an small advice. You tried to edit Stalwart Esports and added info about BGMI There, until and unless you don't have proper references to back it, you can't use anything here. Also just FYI, Robin's lineup was signed by TSM months back so it doesn't belong to stalwart anymore. Moreover, you copied info from an article directly which is blatant copyright. i believe you've done this mistakenly. Good Luck. Warm Regards---Abhay EsportsTalk To Me 08:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Yeah it was a mistake. Thank you for information Abhay. Also thank you for this warm-felt words. Aaditya.abh (talk) 08:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from S8UL Esports. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:34C9:921C:530D:78BC (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of S8UL Esports

The article S8UL Esports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability; they do not appear to have won any major tournaments.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 13:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Sir, s8ul eSports was one of the first major Esports organization in the country that got very popular. It's fanbase is bigger than any Indian eSports organization. Aaditya.abh (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of S8UL Esports for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S8UL Esports is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S8UL Esports until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 15:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Please sir, can I know how may I join the discussion. Aaditya.abh (talk) 15:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

You go to the link at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S8UL Esports and add your comment under the nomination. See also WP:AFDEQ for instructions. ... discospinster _talk 15:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with S8UL Esports. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaming house, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Environment and Analyst. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Platelet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chemical messenger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do NOT edit a project page against consensus as you did at Special:Diff/1043463659 again. -- ferret (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I will make sure my further edits are not "nonsense" and they will be reliable. I don't know if it matters, but I promise to not do any meaningless and wrong edits on purpose. Aaditya.abh (talk) 14:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Global Esports moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Global Esports, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 08:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok cool. CheersGyan.Know (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Global Esports has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Global Esports. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Splitting pages

Hi Gyan.Know. I noticed that you have been splitting articles very large articles (which is generally a good thing!). I just wanted to let you know that if you do carry out these splits of very large/high profile articles, a summary section is required. For example, in the section Kyle Busch#NASCAR career, there needs to not only be {{main|NASCAR career of Kyle Busch}}, but also a summary of his NASCAR career. A couple more housekeeping things that need to be done when making a split are:

• In the edit summary of the newly made article you have created, please include the text: Contents [[WP:SPLIT]] from [[Original article name]]; please see its history for attribution.
• On the talk page of the original and newly created articles, please insert the template: {{split article |from = Original article name |from_oldid = Revision ID from original article prior to split |to = New article name |date = ‎}}

Check out WP:SPLIT#How to properly split an article for more detailed information. If you have any questions, let me know. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 15:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Pbrks, I hope you understand, I didn't did wrong intentionally. Btw, {{split article |from = Original article name |from_oldid = Revision ID from original article prior to split |to = New article name |date = ‎}}, what should I add to "Revision ID from original article prior to split"? GyanKnow _{contributions?} 15:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll make sure to do all this in future. Thank You Pbrks 😊 GyanKnow _{contributions?} 15:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Pbrks Also I have a question, on WP:SPLIT page it says: Add "{{Main|new article name}}" (use the order: image, main tag, text). If all the content of the section is being removed (e.g. in the case of a list) use the "See" template instead of the "Main" template. If necessary (where there is an image, but only a short paragraph of text) add "{{Clear}}" to the end. Use the edit summary "Material [[WP:SPLIT]] to [[New article name]]" and save the edit. It is fine if I use "See" instead of main and don't put a summary? GyanKnow _{contributions?} 15:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

No worries! I know it wasn't intentional. The revision ID can be found by going to the page's history, clicking on the revision prior to the split, and locating the number at the end in the URL (after "oldid="). For example, on Kyle Busch, you would go to the history, click on the revision dated "16:04, 28 September 2021", and see the revision ID "1047060335".

In regards to including a summary, a summary would not be required if the content that was split out was not directly relevant to the article (or was simply a long list). To quote WP:SPLIT: In general, if the split is due to size, then a summary section is required; if the split is due to content (or scope), then a summary section is unlikely to be required.

This is likely why some of the articles you have seen have not already been split — it takes a quite a bit of time/work to summarize these very long sections. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 15:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Pbrks thanks mate. I'll try to add summaries on the pages ASAP GyanKnow _{contributions?} 18:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi I noticed that you recently split the Van Gelder Studio recordings into various decades page and I need to ask if you can please return it to it's form from a few days ago where it just lists all of them on one page. I am researching the studio and writing a book about it and it is very inconvenient when searching for the recordings made there when I have to then go into 3 different pages to see what albums were recorded on a specific date (not a specific year). As the person above said, I think splitting is generally a good thing, but in this case I think it would be better to just have all the recordings from all years on one page. If you could please do this, I would REALLY appreciate it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.226.56 (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

{u|69.125.226.56}} sorry mate it isn't happening. The page was too big and needed splitting. Please read: WP:SPLIT. The page was splitted following Wikipedia guidelines for splitting. GyanKnow _{contributions?} 17:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

• 69.125.226.56 GyanKnow _{contributions?} 17:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Global Esports logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global Esports logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Imperial Noble Consort Jingmin

Hello Gyan.Know. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Imperial Noble Consort Jingmin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The page is not a redirect to draftspace, so the rationale doesn't apply. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Edit over week-end

From your edit at BTS over the week-end. If you have strong recommendations about reducing the size of the Career section of the article for BTS by a certain percentage in size, or if you wish to split the article to have a separate BTS Career article on Wikipedia, then you could start an RFC or discussion on the Talk page at BTS. ErnestKrause (talk) 17:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

ErnestKrause, thanks mate. I'll see what I have to do. Currently I'm a little busy at Afc. GyanKnow _{contributions?} 17:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I have to successfully removed Amazon, wynk

Kindly review again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ariyan_Mehedi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokbul7000 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Mokbul7000I'll see. GyanKnow _{contributions?} 18:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gyan.Know! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help me with my Draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gyan.Know! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I report a page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Curb Safe Charmer thank you for telling me about this Preferences tool. I'll try to make sure to provide summaries every time from now. GyanKnow _{contributions?} 02:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gyan.Know! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I am burdened with glorious purpose!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Final warning - disruptive editing

Hello again. Please know that it is not acceptable to recreate articles that were just deleted at AFD. Especially when it was recent, and you were a very active participant in the discussion. (I'm not sure if you thought we wouldn't notice if you changed your name or what?) I'm particularly disappointed because there's no realistic reason to think that your recreation was acceptable when it's so similar to the original, and I even told you at the AFD not to recreate it prematurely.

If you are caught actively editing against a WP:CONSENSUS or recreating another article like this again, your account will receive a short block. Sergecross73 msg me 17:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:S8UL Esports logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:S8UL Esports logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse Host

Dear Gyan.Know,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Looking at your talk page, I'm not sure how familiar enough you are with the way we work. So, I'd simply ask you to ensure you only answer those questions on which you are confident of the validity of your answer. I found the Teahouse a great place to learn, too, so good luck.

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Sushila Didi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sushila Didi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Esports (December 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Gyan.Know! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

[[Category:Wikipedian

Teahouse host - belated welcome

Dear Gyan.Know,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sushila Didi

Hello, Gyan.Know. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sushila Didi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Amusement Today split

Why did you split the Amusement Today page? There had previously been two discussions and a consensus was never reached. The discussions had proposed Golden Ticket Award before and/or after 2010, not TILL. That isn't even proper English, and certainly not suitable for a page title. I'm undoing this mess.—JlACEer (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushila Didi (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sushila Didi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sushila Didi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 04:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Gyan.Know! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 04:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Gyan.Know,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 805 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 852 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Global Esports

Hello, Gyan.Know. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Global Esports, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Global Esports

Hello, Gyan.Know. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global Esports".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Gyan.Know,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12160 articles, as of 14:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Gyan.Know,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Gyan.Know,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Gyan.Know,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Gyan.Know,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Orphaned non-free image File:Creambell Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Creambell Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jonathan Gaming at an event.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jonathan Gaming at an event.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jonathan Gaming at an event.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jonathan Gaming at an event.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isaac Yaso

The article Isaac Yaso has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ULPS (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Cuevas de Punta del Este is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I love your great work on History of the Jews in İzmir!!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Sad reading but a very good page, Switzerland and the Holocaust is nice work! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Vietnam Veterans Motorcycle Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vietnam Veterans Motorcycle Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnam Veterans Motorcycle Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Origin and disparities in technological advancements & infrastructure compared to automobile safety sector moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Origin and disparities in technological advancements & infrastructure compared to automobile safety sector. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 22:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Origin and disparities in technological advancements & infrastructure compared to automobile safety sector (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Origin and disparities in technological advancements & infrastructure compared to automobile safety sector and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Like all your recent pages, History of the Jews in Budapest is an excellent article. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Jewish economics is outstanding. You are really on a roll! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

BoyTheKingCanDance. Hey there. Just a quick ping to let you know that this user's articles were generated by AI. I didn't see you post in the ANI about it, so this is a courtesy ping to let you know what happened. I hope this helps you spot these kinds of articles in the future, as they sound fluent, but are often full of inaccuracies. I think the articles have all been deleted under CSD G3 Hoax. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Dear Novem Linguae, thanks so much for alerting me. It's shocking. It makes our job as editors so much more difficult. The pages are well constructed, well written and superficially well referenced. I'll be careful. I hope the user has been blocked. Thanks again. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

The UK and the Holocaust

Hi my friend. I love this page and have marked it as reviewed. I wanted you to know that I deleted a word that I felt gave the page a slightly awkward meaning. The sentence said "While it was not directly involved in the perpetration of the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, the UK's policies and actions had a profound impact on the fate of Jewish people during the Holocaust." I removed the word "directly" because it implied that the UK was indirectly involved in the atrocities. While the UK definitely acted abhorently, and left Jews in a worse position, which is clear from the article, I felt the implication that it was involved even indirectly in the atrocities themselves creates a impression that you might not have intended. Of course, I'm not an expert, and I may be wrong, so if you disagree by all means add the word back. Truly my edit wasn't a criticism. I want only to be helpful to you on a great page. Best regards, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@BoyTheKingCanDance No no, whatever edit you did I'm not going to refute against it (unless I was planning to do something with the text you removed) because you are clearly much more superior (ik there isn't supposed to be a superior subordinate thing on WP), and experienced on here than me.

In fact, I want to thank you for making a page created by me better. GyanKnow _{contributions?} 11:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

You do such a great job! Your pages are so well constructed! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Yaakov Bentolila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yaakov Bentolila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaakov Bentolila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spicy (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Is Yaakov Bentolila a real person? I can't find him anywhere on Google and the two sources that appear to be about him at The New York Times and The Jerusalem Post don't seem to exist. Can you offer any evidence or explanation for the non-existent sources? Alansohn (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spicy (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Please respond to questions at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected_hoax_content_and_LLM_use_by_User:Gyan.Know EvergreenFir (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Isaac Yaso

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Isaac Yaso, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 19:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing article space for creating hoaxes and repeatedly falsifying references. Improper use of AI is also a concern. Please explain your conduct at WP:ANI. Cullen328 (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Akademia Nasionala del Ladino

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Akademia Nasionala del Ladino, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 19:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of R&B and soul music

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as R&B and soul music, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 19:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalil Hachimi Idrissi

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Khalil Hachimi Idrissi, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Anders Widmark and Sara Isaksson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anders Widmark and Sara Isaksson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Widmark and Sara Isaksson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VioletEscalator (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jewish economics

The article Jewish economics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page has been recently created by somebody who has been blocked for hoaxing using AI. As is, the article on its merits, even if not a complete hoax mess, is just complete WP:SYNTH that doesn't amount to a proper encyclopedic article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Piracy in the Indian Ocean

The article Piracy in the Indian Ocean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United Kingdom and the Holocaust

The article United Kingdom and the Holocaust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Occult writers and antisemitism

The article Occult writers and antisemitism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nahal Rafiah

The article Nahal Rafiah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Switzerland and the Holocaust

The article Switzerland and the Holocaust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the Jews in İzmir

The article History of the Jews in İzmir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cuevas de Punta del Este

The article Cuevas de Punta del Este has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the Jews in Lviv

The article History of the Jews in Lviv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the Pope´s Jews in Provence

The article History of the Pope´s Jews in Provence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the Jews in Budapest

The article History of the Jews in Budapest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the Spanish and Portuguese Jews in France

The article History of the Spanish and Portuguese Jews in France has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sephardic Jews in Romania

The article Sephardic Jews in Romania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jewish Quarter of Damascus

The article Jewish Quarter of Damascus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jews and the diamond trade

The article Jews and the diamond trade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content not suitable for an encyclopedia due to pronounced LLM-related risks -- with respect to verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view. High likelihood that it contains serious errors. Better to Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 22:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Legend of Exorcism

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Legend of Exorcism, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Recent speedy deletions and block

Hi! in case you hadn't noticed/missed the block notice in between the swath of speedy deletions: your recent use of AI to write wikipedia articles has caught the atention of the administrator's noticeboard. Because of the legitimate risk of harm to the 'pedia this conduct can cause, you've been blocked until it can be confirmed that you won't continue doing this. Please report to administrator's noticeboard/incidents (WP:ANI) to explain yourself. the relevant section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected hoax content and LLM use by User:Gyan.Know. Good luck! --Licks-rocks (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sushila Didi

Hello, Gyan.Know. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sushila Didi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)