Hurricaneguy
Don't disrupt the Wiki if you still want to be an editor
editNo I was not mean! You were disputing Jason Rees's talk page. If the editor didn't want to respond to your comment they have the right to blank/remove it off their talk page. Slapping a 3RR warning for no reason at all is also disruption. I've you want to be an Wiki editor you need to stop the disruption and start contributing positively to the community. Bidgee (talk) 00:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ditto on the above Guy. You've blanked a number of pages in the past few days (not including your own) and have been generally disruptive. You say wikipedia is not for you but you continue to add messages around the place. Please make up your mind to become a decent editor or go and find something else to do that doesn't aggravate you so much.--VirtualSteve need admin support? 03:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Editing is my life though!!! I have no life I edit Wikipedia all day! Yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Hurricaneguy (talk) 03:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC))
August 2009
edit
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VirtualSteve need admin support? 04:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)