You Like It Darker moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to You Like It Darker. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:California Golden Seals - Cleveland Barons seasons

edit

 Template:California Golden Seals - Cleveland Barons seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the Empire of Liberty upload

edit

Sorry about my reversion of your edit; I hadn't purged/reloaded the Empire of Liberty page, so it's still showing up with the sticker on it, but when I look at the file page I see you've replaced it with the cover sans that. Great to have that! Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 23:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I though as much. Thank you for taking on the project of improving articles on these books! Jmj713 (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:You Like It Darker

edit
 

Hello, Jmj713. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "You Like It Darker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Eternal (Klaus Schulze album)

edit

Hi @Jmj713: I had to revert this article after I reviewed it, part of the WP:NPP process. I couldn't find anything on it. Just reverting it and not adding sourcing is deep uncool and probably disruptive. That was the reason the redirect was put in the first place, because its not sourced. If you have genuine referenced put them, but if you revert it without adding source, I'll need to start issuing warnings against you, for disruptive editing. I did a WP:BEFORE to search for coverage and their is not a lot. A couple of decent reviews using sources from WP:MUSICRS would do it. scope_creepTalk 20:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but what I feel is disruptive is deleting correct information. I'm always for preserving information, not removing it. There are links and sources already added to the article, and I feel those are enough. There is not a lot of coverage, this is true, but that doesn;t mean information about this album should just be deleted, I completely disagree with that approach. Jmj713 (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply