Maduant

Removal of financials added by now-blocked users

Hi. I noticed you're removing financials from company articles added by now-blocked users (UPE I guess?). I'm wondering if there's a policy backing for your en masse removal — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

The norm is to clean up edits made by sockpuppets per WP:SOCKSTRIKE especially when there are UPE concerns. The blocking admin did revert some of the additions [1], but probably didn't want to wade through the entire contribution history of both accounts. Maduant (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Heads up

Hi, I've reverted two of your edits at Paytm and One97 Communications. You added a merge template to both of them without starting a discussion on talk. Per WP:MERGE, unless the merge is obvious, it should be discussed first. Here as the pages share some overlap, but it's not immediately clear that they're exactly the same content or a similar enough criteria. So I'd suggest starting a discussion if you still want to merge (instead of copyedit) Soni (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

See WP:BUREAU. Feel free to chime in at Talk:Paytm#Proposed merge of One97 Communications into Paytm. Maduant (talk) 08:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Information Removal

Hi Maduant,
Article ICICI Prudential Life Insurance is on my watch list. And, I have noticed that recently, you have made multiple changes to it. The majority of the information was written by me sometime back. I would like to understand more about the deletion of the sections like Advertising and marketing campaigns, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives and Awards and accreditation as they were having strong references. However, I am aware that Milestones and Key people can be trimmed down. VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 14:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

As explained in the edit summaries, the content was just marketing fluff and in violation of WP:PROMOTION. There was also a strong indication of WP:COI, so I need to ask you to disclose if you are/were being compensated to edit that page. Maduant (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Reverted the Edits of the page!

You have restored the old version of our page Gateway Technolabs without having words on Talk, it should be raised earlier if any issue you have found. The last version had latest and authentic information so it should be restored permanently. PriteshGajjar7 (talk) 07:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting the changes we edited.?. Krishnarajapura is the name. In metro previously they had named Krishnarajapuram, but they renamed to Krishnarajapura because it is the original name. So please change it back to Krishnarajapura or KR Pura. PARYAANTARYA (talk) 05:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LTIMindtree logo 2022.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LTIMindtree logo 2022.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)