Archive 1

re: Article on Project Fanboy website

edit

Hi,

I looked through the article and converted a few references to templated format. It looks to be fairly good, although a few of the refs don't meet wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, but that's a bit of a gray area. (blogs, convention websites, etc) You shouldn't have any problems with moving it to the mainspace. ffm 11:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request for your opinion

edit

Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space

edit

  Hey there Millennium Cowboy, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Millennium Cowboy/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jason M. Burns for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason M. Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason M. Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply