N2e

A dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jackzhp#September_2020

User:WhoKnows (talk) 22:28, 31 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject SpaceX

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are please add support on it proposal page. @N2e:

Proposed deletion of Data structure (disambiguation)

The article Data structure (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

"Blue Origin landing platform" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Blue Origin landing platform has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § Blue Origin landing platform until a consensus is reached. 64.229.88.34 (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, much has changed. Blue now has two vessels that they've designated for that role, and unfortunately, have named both of them two names, and the same names. I've commented on your RFD, and have spent nearly an hour cleaning up the various redirects and disambigs related to all those articles. N2e (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Tesla cybercab

Part of the reaons here is that so often Musk is making stuff up regarding timelines. So, this isn't like GM saying something is going into production by next year and of course it actually does. But noting that Musk is saying this, so this isn't some kind of corporate committment, but just him saying stuff.... --ZimZalaBim ^talk 04:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Tesla as a source?

Hi @N2e:

I guess you think Tesla site

https://www.tesla.com/NACS

cited on top of the table is not a valid source for

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Supercharger

NACS adoption timeline

"...citation at the top of a table section is always out of date and fails to cover many subsequent edits..."

That's the whole point.  Tesla grants access to 5 companies currently.  We need to check with Tesla's source on top of the table against the other 5 companies to see whether there's any discrepancy. Tamnguyenrn (talk) 22:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what you are talking about User:Tamnguyenrn. Can you provide the name of the article and some specific edit.

Obviously, Tesla can be a source. But the problem with that primary source, especially at the "top of the table" as you said, could be many things. Perhaps it not easily verifiable as to the date the previous editor checked it; or perhaps it is simply a better source needed situation. I'd have to know what article or edit you are talking about to be able to tell. N2e (talk) 02:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi N2e. Thank you for your work on November 2024 Amsterdam attacks. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is already another article about this, Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 04:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Man @GrabUp:, I worked really hard to find another article first, before creating that one. I did over a half dozen Wikipedia searches, and nothing came up. So figured I'd just stub out a new article, following normal policy (notability, verifiability, nothing undue or too likely to show a POV, etc.)

Welp, the content will clearly have to be merged. But I think that the title I chose is the far more neutral one. N2e (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I support your title. The article was created just 6 minutes before yours. GrabUp - Talk 04:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)