Nivamp

Concern regarding Draft:Major Fortune

Hello, Nivamp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Major Fortune, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Major Fortune

Hello, Nivamp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Major Fortune".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

"Red, Blue, and Yellow" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Red, Blue, and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red, Blue, and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

"Red, Blue and Yellow" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Red, Blue and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red, Blue and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

"Red Blue and Yellow" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Red Blue and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red Blue and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Barrister" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Barrister has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 9 § The Barrister until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

"Not to be confused" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Not to be confused has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § Not to be confused until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Viktoria Milvidskaia Belinsky

added a link pointing to Belinsky

Vissarion Belinsky

added a link pointing to Belinsky

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Lázaro Garza Ayala, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ayala and Garza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

"Les escargots" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Les escargots has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 8 § Les escargots until a consensus is reached. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

It is the native French name of René Laloux's short film The Snails. It should therefore redirect to The Snails' article but since The Snails doesn't have its article, it redirects to Laloux's. Nivamp (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

"C)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect C) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § C) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

"O)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect O) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § O) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hatnotes on the topic

Hi there. I have reverted a couple of your edits because you added hatnote entries that are related to the topic at hand and are really sub-articles/topics of the main article. Hatnotes are for unrelated articles and related articles should be linked inside the article instead of the hatnote per WP:RELATED. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 19:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTBROKEN and avoid making WP:COSMETIC edits. TylerBurden (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Norse mythology. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Charles King Van Riper

Your entry on the Charles King Van Riper article reads "In this Dutch name, the surname is Van Riper, not Riper." The traditional Dutch spelling of his name is Van Ryper" so, should the text read:

In this Dutch name, the surname is Ryper, not Riper.

Greg Henderson (talk) 01:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

The family name uses the Dutch van prefix which is what the hatnote refers to. What the traditional Dutch spelling of the name is doesn't matter because that's not the spelling Charles King Van Riper used. Nivamp (talk) 05:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plastic film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plastic (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Marxism lead sentence

The only difference between 'Marxism' and 'Marxismus' is two additional letters placed at the end; adding the German word (and formating) clutters the lead sentence. Would you add the Latin equivalent, Marxismus in the lead? Neither 'Marxism is useful or necessary. Consider the reader; in the English Wikipedia, 'Marxism' is expected. 'Whilst' and (While), also differing by only two letters, is never seen. In additional to the above considerations, I also used WP:BETTER/GRAF1 from WP:MoS. If necessary, discussion at Talk:Marxism is available. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 21:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC) —

I wouldn't add the Latin equivalent because Marxism is not a Latin-language idea, it's a German-language one. By telling the reader what "Marxism" is in German, it then tells the reader that this is a foreign idea and what it is called in its original language which I would say is useful information. Nivamp (talk) 17:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, Nivamp, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Soundbrews (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Ava "Kris" Tyson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ava "Kris" Tyson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Ginestà, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coloma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and contains unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with other attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Peep Show characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mitchell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Just Stop Oil Sunflowers protest

Hello. Per WP:BRD, please undo your last edit to the above page. I removed the name of the case as the event's notability is primarily about the protest and the primary source does not constitute due weight.--Launchballer 20:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Italicizing terms

Thank you for this edit at Drag (entertainment), which was an improvement to the article. One kind of tricky point concerns your edit summary: you said, To maintain consistency, but please note that it has nothing to do with consistency, which could imply that double quotes would have been correct if the majority of the article alreadyused double quotes, but this is not the case. In fact, italicizing terms when used this way is a requirement per MOS:WAW, so if you run into a situation like this, feel free to link that guideline in your summary. In particular, even if all of the terms were double-quoted, they would all have to be changed to italics, so consistency doesn't enter into it.

One kind of trick you can use to figure out whether to use double quotes or italics, is to insert the expression the term or the word into the sentence before the words you are not sure how to punctuate; if that doesn't change the meaning, then use italics, if it does, or if the sentence makes no sense that way, then use double quotes. Example:

• The use of drag in this sense appeared in print as early as 1870.   – from: Drag (entertainment)
  • The use of the term drag in this sense appeared in print as early as 1870 – (means the same thing: use italics)
• General relativity predicts that any rotating mass will tend to slightly "drag" along the spacetime immediately surrounding it.   – from: Black hole
  • General relativity predicts that any rotating mass will tend to slightly the term "drag" along the spacetime immediately surrounding it. – (garbles the meaning: use double quotes in the original sentence)
• The event did not use the word "drag" or refer to drag performances in the promotional poster.   – from: Tennessee Adult Entertainment Act; it already has the expression the word before drag in double quotes
  • The event did not use the word drag or refer to drag performances in the promotional poster. – (double quotes are wrong in that article, it must be italics per MOS:WAW; this article should be changed!)

Hope this helps, and once again, thanks for your improvement to the article. Mathglot (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)