Omegastar

Looks like your doing great on the Top 2000 article. Navou ^talk 23:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Navou ^talk 23:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words about my maps

Thank you, Omega, for your kind words about my maps. It's fun, and one way to contribute. MapMaster (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Alberik II, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I understand. I translated the article from the dutch wikipedia. It seems the person who created the dutch article did use a credible source, ill ask him to confirm it and then ill add it. Omegastar (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

RE: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Webb (historian)

The site you mention appears to be a mirror of wikipedia. Ikip (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I see. cheers. Omegastar (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Colgone War? Auntieruth55 (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William of Enckenvoirt

Hello! Your submission of William of Enckenvoirt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 19:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

AFD

Can you articulate more at the AFD on why to keep the article, your remarks are being disregarded because they were so short ... AT another AFD the same remark was ignored and the article deleted, even though you voted to keep, the admin person disregarded your tersely written comments. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Örbom

Can you just add a little more detail at Anders Örbom, so your !vote is not discounted? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Biljoen Castle

According to someone who knows a lot more about computers, probably this happened. Due to some strange error in Explorer the menubar I mentioned was painted in backgroundcolor. I experienced this before, but the trouble is that you don't realize it when it happens the first time you look at a site. So that site seemed a lot smaller than it actually was ! Maasje 11:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Well im glad it was sorted out :) Omegastar (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

adding edit summary

Hi Omega, how is the article going? Just a thought...I've noticed on your edits on Martin Schenck (and others) that you've not completed an edit summary. Just a brief description on that line saying what you did would be helpful. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh i thought you knew already. I finished the article, its here: Claude de Berlaymont Its not that much, but he wasnt that remarkable ^^ Ill remember to put something in the edit summary for my future edits. Omegastar (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Joachim Cronman is up for deletion again

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman (2nd nomination)

DYK for William of Enckenvoirt

On September 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William of Enckenvoirt, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cmadler (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Photo request

Is Amstelveen convenient to where you are? If so, would you mind photographing the KLM headquarters in Amstelveen? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Ah - Thanks anyways :) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Ó and O

Hi Omegastar, thanks for the compliment. One thing; I'm trying to get all the Ó's back under the O listing for County Galway, but not sure how. Help? Fergananim (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. No, what I want to know is how to merge all the Ó's into the O section. Or if it should be done at all. I do not want to change Ó to O. Fergananim (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman (3rd nomination)

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Cronman (3rd nomination). Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 23:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Citation needed for Noordsche Compagnie page.

Hi. Nice work on the page you just created. I never got around to making a page for the Noordsche Compagnie. I was wondering if you could tell me what your source was for the following:

"Willem Cornelisz. van Muyden, a resident of Amsterdam, was one of the first captains to set sail for the company. On board there were five French Basques and an English navigator, Alan Sallows. The remaining crew came from North-Holland."

I added the tidpit about Sallows. I assume you were referring to the expedition sent to Spitsbergen in 1612? As that was the only year I know of where they had to use an English pilot. I'd like to know, in particular, where you obtained the information on the five French Basques used for the expedition? I had only known of Basque whalers being used for the 1613 expedition to Spitsbergen (in which they shipped a dozen), but I thought they didn't have any on their first hunting expedition to Spitsbergen. Could you clear this up? Jonas Poole (talk) 02:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Worst Genocide in Human History

Please create the AfD subpage with {{subst:afd2|pg=Worst Genocide in Human History|cat=S|text=Your reason for deletion}}. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 15:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

county of Namur

Namur was erected as a marquisat (margraviat, two sinonimous terms at that time) for Baldwin IV of Hainaut, though before this could be completed Baldwin had died and the large marquisat (Namur, Laroche and Durbuy, probably also Luxembourg and Hainaut, but I'd have to look that up) intended for him was split and his son only received a remnant of the original county as his marquisat. So your move of that page was not entirely correct, on the other hand, the county is better known.--Caranorn (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually the two articles Margrave and Marquis seem to treat the terms at different periods in time. Or to be exact, the marquis article seems to deal with the modern, particularly british context, while the margrave article looks at the historical context. And yes, margrave means count of a march (border), a very specific type of count. Note, the dutch language article actually talks about the margraviat Boudewijn IV verwierf uiteindelijk Namen als markgraafschap terwijl Ermesinde Luxemburg, Laroche en Durbuy verwierf. The french language article also mentions this, unfortunatelly without going into any detail (thought I'd have added that back when I was active on the various wikipedias). I can't read any of our other articles about the county so can't say what state they are in. Anyhow, I will take a look at two sources to see how I can expand the medieval period section.--Caranorn (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hadn't seen your comment on the coats of arms, thanks. I will probably just add some material to the county of Namur article for the time period from Henry I to the arrival of the Dampierre dynasty. I plan to stay wiki-retired, but I still contribute on occasion.--Caranorn (talk) 18:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

George Frideric Handel

Hello Omegastar, could you take a look at George Frideric Handel and improve my English where necessary. I am in trouble with some wikipedians from downunder and need your help in the first half of the article (till 1741).Taksen (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I dont understand. What problems do you have with those other wikipedians? Cant you work together? Omegastar (talk) 11:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Jaffna Kingdom

Thx Taprobanus (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

(explained here) are really helpful to other editors, in that if you add them it is quicker to work out what you've done. Please consider using them. HeartofaDog (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I know it can be a pain - not the end of the world if you don't.HeartofaDog (talk) 02:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Doornenburg Castle

Hello Omegastar. If I am not mistaken, your Doornenburg Castle article is actually a translation of the Dutch article Kasteel Doornenburg which happens to be written by me. Would you be so kind as to acknowledge this fact by indicating it at the end of the article or on the discussion page - whichever is deemed an appropriate copyright notice at en-wp. Thank you in advance. Muijz (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

In fact the idea of the template is that you refer to a specific version of the article, (the version that you actually translated). Not to the article in general. (The article might have been totally altered.) Please refer to the version that was translated. See Template:Translated page for more details. Muijz (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User Factstraight

Oh my god! Thank you! I have been feeling like this for ages =\ what do I do?! LPC (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Lists of state leaders per year

The title of these articles explicitly state that they are lists of rulers in a given year, and that's what these lists now provide, in a clearer and shorter format.

The pattern I've been using is this:

Where the name of the state implies the title of the ruler e.g.

[[Duchy of xxxx]] - [[name]], [[Duke of xxxx]]

I've condensed it down to

[[Duchy of xxxx]] - [[name]]

and where the name of the ruler includes the title, I've condensed that down e.g.

[[yyy, Duke of xxxx], [[Duke of xxxx]]

condenses down to

[[yyy, Duke of xxxx]]

In addition I've been adding diacritics, correcting unbalanced parentheses, fixing the sort keys for the categories, etc. The reader who wants a link to the full set of rulers for a particular state can find that link in the article for the specific ruler or the specific state that they're interested in. Colonies Chris (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Your comparison with removing years or the state name makes no sense because in removing the title, where the state name already implies it, I'm not taking anything away that isn't readily available; the state name and the years are essential to the stated purpose of these lists so of course they must be present. A question that needs to be considered is 'how might any reader actually use these lists?' - how would they get to one of these lists and, and what would they be looking for? To take a year at random, look at List of state leaders in 1016. This is only linked from the preceding and following years, and from 1016 and from the article Lists of state leaders by year, which is a list of links by year. So unless a user types the full article name - which is unlikely - they're only going to get there from other year-specific articles. It seems likely to me that a reader would be looking for information about a specific year, and probably about a specific state or region at that time. That's what these articles are for - they're an index from year and state to ruler-name. I can't see any likelihood that a reader would be looking for the complete history of a specific ruler's title. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

That WikiProject has been tagged inactive since 2008 (and it still recommends linking the years: I agree with you that they'd be better not linked), so there'd be little point in starting a discussion there. (And there doesn't seem to have been any discussion about the format anyway.) The articles seem rather neglected to me - just look at the wildly inconsistent state of the category keys, which I've been slowly sorting out. I've now almost reached the point where someone looking at Category:Lists of state leaders by year will see all the articles in a sensible order.

• Predecessor and successor are always available on the ruler's page, which will also link to the article about the role/title itself, which will give the entire history of the holders of the title.
• There is no issue about multiple roles - I'm only condensing as described above, so no confusion about regents etc, could arise.
• I expect there are some cases where the link to the person doesn't exist but the link to the title does (but I haven't come across any). A good approach to that might be to create redirects from the person's name to the generic article about their title; this would provide the reader with some contextual information about that person and allow for possible expansion into a full article later. Colonies Chris (talk) 23:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

En dashes

Spaces are indeed used on both sides of an en dash indicating a range when the terms on either side are themselves spaced (21 October 1864 – 9 October 1952), but no spaces should be used between plain year numbers (1938–2002). Please see WP:NDASH: "Disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items." Deor (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Thnaks

This is just to say a big thank you for you nice comment on my page. I appreciate it when other editors like yourself, give a keep it up note here and there. Will continue to expand Ghana and Africa related topics on WP. Once again, thanks. A friend called -- CrossTempleJay  → talk 19:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Omegastar! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries redux

Hello, Omegastar,

A string of twenty-one (21) of your recent edits showed up recently on my watchlist minus edit summaries. I am now faced with the unenviable choice of either ignoring my watchlist, or of painstakingly wading through the Edit histories of 21 articles. In the former case, the purpose of my watchlist is negated; in the latter, I waste my time in an unenjoyable dull task that may be unnecessary. Either case can be perceived by me as rudeness, but I shall take it on good faith this time that it is somehow a case of simple error.

In the future, could you please include an edit summary, even if it is checking the box for "This is a minor edit"?

Georgejdorner (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Apologies accepted. I did check the first couple of your edits without summaries, and detected no malign intent. I am sensitive to edit summaries due to a recent rash of adolescent vandalism on articles on my Watchlist.

Why not check off that little box for "This is a minor edit" and let it go at that, with no commentary needed? That lessens your burden as you go about your useful little editing chore. It's just one little click.

And I want to end by thanking you for undertaking that little chore. Small improvements in existing articles can accrue into great improvements, and I admire your diligence in correction.

Georgejdorner (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Grammar

Thanks, Omegastar! Actually, i created that article in a very short notice, so i may imagine that is was bad. Sorry, i usually check my articles several times, but that one sliped me... :) All best, and thanks again! --WhiteWriter^speaks 19:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Top 2000 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bazonka (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicholas John Hannen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Sir Nicholas Hannen''' (24 August 1842 – 27 April 1900was a British [[barrister]], [[diplomat]] and [[judge]] who
• Hannen Road (海能路）in Shanghai was named for Hannen. It has now been renamed Hainan Road (海南路).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Heh, what a useful bot, I did make a mistake there ^^ Omegastar (talk) 13:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Omegastar! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Butler dates

do you have a source for all these detailed dates thatt you're adding to the Butler articles? If so, can you ref it please? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Omegastar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Omegastar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Omegastar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Omegastar! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)