Padmanabhanunnips

• Archives

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde (Talk) 04:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether you're choosing to ignore what you are being told, or whether you simply cannot understand it. You are prohibited from making any edit related to caste. After being blocked for one month for violating this, you immediately returned to making caste-related edits. I have therefore blocked you again, and blocked you indefinitely. This does not mean you are blocked forever; it means that to be able to edit again, you need to explain what it is you did wrong, and why it will not happen again. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padmanabhanunnips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes. I was unable to understand the Wikipedia policies properly. Unknowingly I started editing the same articles again. I understand that I am prohibited from editing mainly because of not providing proper references. I assure that in my future edits I will be providing references. Please unblock. -Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but this request is not good enough. Because you refused to use references, you are topic-banned from editing about caste. If you wish to return to editing, you need to make it clear you will respect that by not editing about caste, period. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Padmanabhanunnips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes. I am not much aware about the policies. Being a native of Kerala, I was trying to correct the caste related articles related to Castes in Kerala. Being an inexperienced person, I might have made mistakes in editing. I humbly request you to guide me. I will not edit anything about castes in future. Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am unblocking based on your committment to abiding by the topic ban. 331dot (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Okay. What will you edit about instead? 331dot (talk) 13:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Other topics of my interest. Traditional Arts, Musical Instruments, etc. Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

I just want you to understand what you are getting into- a topic ban means that you may not make any edits about that topic, regardless of how closely related to the topic the edit. This means that, if an edit at all involves castes, regardless of how little, you can't make it. Do you understand? 331dot (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

OK. I will keep it in my mind while editing. Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 17:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Vanamonde93 Do you find this satisfactory? 331dot (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

@331dot: yes, I'm okay with that. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)