RadiculousJ

Terms etc

I'd say it's a "series" because the MCX name covers multiple weapons of different classifications (carbine, SBR, assault rifle and the one that meets the US legal definition of a pistol). Also strictly "carbine rifle" isn't incorrect unless you use the definition of rifle that doesn't fit in context (full length version of a carbine), which is less common these days since a lot of modern carbines don't have a companion "rifle" anyway: so in the strictest sense, if you use that definition you can't call the MCX a carbine either. The more general definition does work since it's possible to have a carbine pistol (eg Mauser C96 with stock or Artillery Luger). Herr Gruber (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I concede on the "series" argument. What about "carbine-length rifle"? If not, I'm fine with "carbine rifle". RadiculousJ (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Unexplained deletions

If you don't leave an edit summary explaining why you're deleting sourced material, then at least start a talk page discussion.[1] Thanks. Felsic2 (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Crisp

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jacob Crisp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 14:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: Sorry. Left my account open in college. RadiculousJ (talk) 14:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Recommend you don't do that. Benefit of the doubt applies this time, but if something like that happens again, you're liable to be blocked as a compromised account. Insert your choice of long diatribe on the importance of cyber-security here. Yunshui ^雲_水 14:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

WZ-523

If you're going to move WZ523 to WZ-523, I suggest you also do the same for WZ551 to WZ-551 for consistency's sake. Thanks, --Katangais (talk) 07:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Gun actions

• See Talk:Bolt action#Requested move 27 January 2017 and Talk:Pump action#Requested move 27 January 2017. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Your proposal to merge P227 makes no sense

The P227 is a .45 ACP caliber handgun. There are NO .45 ACP caliber handguns in P226. Your suggestion is improper. Digitallymade (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Digitallymade: To be honest, I'd forgotten all about that, and agree that the P227 requires a separate article. I'll remove the proposal. RadiculousJ (talk) 13:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FN 509 (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FN 509 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello! RadiculousJ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Spelling

I just came across this edit which you made last June. The names of certain elements, namely aluminium, caesium, and sulfur, are spelled in the IUPAC-recommended ways in Chemistry articles on Wikipedia, as shown here. The relevant shortcut is WP:ALUM. Please let me know if you have any queries. --John (talk) 21:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:FN 509 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FN 509, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RadiculousJ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:FN 509 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FN 509, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:FN 509

Hello, RadiculousJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FN 509".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RadiculousJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Battle of Anghiari (painting)

The MOS (WP:VAMOS) rightly discourages disamming by "painting" - because in fact it very rarely "works just fine". Please move it back. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 04:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in United States Secretary of Homeland Security, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 14:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

MAC-10

Hi, I stumbled across your sandbox while checking links to deleted categories. This looks like a WP:COPYARTICLE but with some new work in it; you may want to merge it to the live article before it gets blanked or deleted. – Fayenatic London 21:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent G6 deletions...

...facilitating the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry page move were no bueno. Please correct. Primergrey (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Huh? RadiculousJ (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm Bobby Cohn. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

In regard to the comment you left in the RM: you may or may not be aware but that user is using their own name as their username on the project. In the future, it is best to avoid commenting on other users' names and stick to policy and guideline based arguements or providing sources and analysis in discussions. If you truly believe an editor's name to be disruptive and in violation of our username policy, then there are proper procedures to address it. Please avoid anything that may be construed as a personal attack in the future. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)