Zelchenko

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Branxholm Tower.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Branxholm Tower.jpg and also as Image:Lg 213-2.jpg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Dover Beach

Thank you for the addition to the Dover Beach page. I was unaware of this echo of the poem. Mddietz (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

It's the basis for the NY Review of Books article "The Rattle of Pebbles"[1][2] by Jason Epstein, which in turn was the inspiration for his Book Business. My mother, who is in a nursing home now, recited the poem to me word-for-word, which sent me to your article. Zelchenko (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thelma Schoonmaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schoonmaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Acrylamide

Something went wrong here [3]. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Charles H. Kerr Irving Meirovits Stock Certificate 200dpi.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Goodspeed (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Goodspeed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Goodspeed concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Goodspeed, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Goodspeed

Hello, Zelchenko. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Thomas Goodspeed".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zelchenko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #16904 was submitted on Nov 15, 2016 10:13:40. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Sparkline edits

Hi there. I appreciate your passion on the Sparkline article. When I say "poorly sourced" I do not mean that it's true or not, just that there is no source. If Edward Tufte has made statements about the inspiration for sparklines that can be cited per Wikipedia convention I would be happy to work with you to integrate them into the article as appropriate. Thomas Craven (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Zelchenko. I see you've rolled back Sparkline again. Let's connect to discuss what's needed citation-wise and how to integrate Peter Zelchenko's contributions to the development of sparklines in an appropriate way. I'll add a section at the bottom of Talk:Sparkline and we can work through it there. I'd love to help add encyclopedic content with citations. I don't think the existing article meets Wikipedia's standards though, so we'll need to improve/reformat it. With a proper source, I'm sure that will be doable. Thomas Craven (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

→ Edit to also thank you for adding the link to the Wayback Machine. It doesn't address all the information in the caption (which might also belong in the main text), but it is a great start! Thomas Craven (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

→→ Apologies, editing again to add that I have just now seen your additions to my user page! I will dig in some more later, but it looks like there's a lot of notable stuff I can hopefully help find links for and add to appropriate articles. Many thanks! Thomas Craven (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sustainability critique page or index

Andy Couturier just popped up again on my radar with his new book. He was just here in Shanghai. Need a page or index that grabs all of these (if just to show how transient they really are). Remember Foer 12 x 12, Affluenza, Elaine St. James, Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin, Duane Elgin, all the way back to Emerson, Franklin, etc.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crowdfunding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Point. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jose Guevara

Hello, Zelchenko. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jose Guevara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jose Guevara (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jose Guevara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jose Guevara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Zelchenko! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jose Guevara (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jose Guevara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jose Guevara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Teahouse that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Theroadislong. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Theroadislong I don't buy it. If I am offended by someone's snide and passive-aggressive remarks, I'm going to go ahead and let them know. It's very easy for an established persona to "look" cool when what they're doing is actually very offensive and hurtful. It's also very easy for you, as a cultural peer of his, to feel a subtle urge to protect him and minimize his faults while magnifying the faults of the outsider. You're not a police officer, and even if you were, your job would be to try to see both sides of the situation. Zelchenko (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Adam Savage

Hello, Zelchenko. I don't have any problem with your helpful addition to Adam Savage, but I don't understand the need to insult Savage in the edit summary. The thing with a user-generated encyclopedia is that people will write about the things that interest them; if you think there should be an article about Whitney Lee Savage, you might like to write it yourself. Anyway, I've revision deleted your edit summary as a WP:BLP violation. Bishonen | tålk 09:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC).

Fine. Morality police are all over Wikipedia. If it helps fulfill you in an otherwise uneventful career, then enjoy your fun. For the record, Adam Savage is a tireless self-promoter. Half of his product involves figuring out how to get a word in edgewise about his own relatively unspectacular accomplishments. Powerful people promote themselves without acknowledging how large of a leg up they actually had. When someone hires a ghostwriter to edit his Wikipedia page, he at least should ghostwrite in acknowledgment of how he got where he did. Zelchenko (talk) 00:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Multiplane camera

Hi Zelchenko, I have a question about your additions to the Multiplane camera article, which I posted on the talk page. Just letting you know, in case you miss it! Toughpigs (talk) 17:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

A Chicago Barnstar for you!

		The Chicago Barnstar
		Zelchenko, I saw and appreciated your edits on the Gentrification of Chicago article. I'm working on an article that needs editing and input: Draft:Gentrification of New York City, if you have the time and interest, please take a look. -Wil540 art (talk) 05:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)