Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 North American cold wave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Stifle (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1994 North American cold wave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes, it was cold. But what makes this single day event notable? The Banner talk 09:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep 100 deaths; and still remembered/written about in 2013, an "enduring" quality that moves beyond WP:NOTNEWS. Has WP:GNG. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm, what I have nominated was a totally different article than the present version. And with seven redirects (1994 cold wave, 1994 North American cold snap, 1994 cold snap, 1994 coldwave, 1994 coldsnap, 1994 cold, 1994 cold weather) I was at a loss straight away. The Banner talk 20:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as Green Cardamom points out, there is WP:PERSISTENCE for this event, therefore passing WP:GNG. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close as keep as nominator. Author changed a poor, sloppy thing in a real article. Convinced of worthiness now. The Banner talk 20:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.