Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achara Kirk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Achara Kirk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability, the article has links to primary sources not independent of the subject. Not much reliable sources found online to meet WP:GNG Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 19:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 19:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 19:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete claims are absurd. She's not a cinematographer, she edits youtube videos. Vexations (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete was a dubious redirect to a film had a small role in, which was fine as per WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP, but now since it's up for discussion, she hardly qualifies for notability.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rahrumi here, Ok so 2 people have nominated for deletion without background checking. First "Claims are absurd that she is a cinematographer", she indeed is a cinematographer if you want I can give links to the works. Second "She hardly Qualifies for Notability" Please do look at her Instagram profile for no. of followers or just search her name on Google. Please do check Backgrounds and information outside The Godamn Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahrumi (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There you go someone asked cinematography credit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QQZmgjUiYT4 Check in description for the credit. Notability: https://www.instagram.com/acharakirk/ Rahrumi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahrumi (talk • contribs) [reply]
Delete Inflated claims, insufficient coverage to establish notability.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThatMontrealIP what else do you want Sir/Madam? Whatever you ask for I'll bring it on.... Atleast Look at the links I've given.... Rahrumi (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2020(UTC)

Please stop posting to the talk pages of every single person who !votes here. You might not like it but this person is not notably by our notability standard. Instagram followers do not matter here. IMDB is a user-generated source and cannot be used for determining notability.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThatMontrealIP Sir/Madam.... You are telling me Instagram followers do not matter.... Let's leave the IMDb aside.... So what else do you want in order to prove the notability? Tell me that I'll bring you... If I can.... Its a discussion page and you have voted for deletion.... Its just like the Jury... I've to present my case also and if you need more evidence then tell me... WHAT DO YOU WANT? That's my primary question.... Rahrumi (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2020(UTC)

Read the advice links at the top of this page, in the box "New to AfD?"ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about her. Per WP:ARBITRARY, having hundred thousands of followers on IG doesn't make one notable. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see youtube links, IMDB database citations, and advertisements for films where she had a credited acting role. None of them support her even coming close to any of the three criteria for WP:NACTOR. Youtube hardly qualifies for meeting WP:FILMMAKER as these creators are not industry peers, their works are not reviewed by professional critics as those from studios, and their works, while entertaining, are not presented at film festivals or film industry awards. Ran as "Achara Kirk" +actress search and all I got were general celebrity sites with very basic IMDB information. Now I also did search "youtube bots" and got pages and pages of services and bots that promise to increase youtube views and subscribers. If she does achieve acting or legitimate filmmaking notability in the future an article can be re-created. Blue Riband► 00:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tagged this as A7 early on, but the tag was apparently removed by the author. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to qualify general notability criteria. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2020
Delete. Subject doesn't meet WP:GNG. GiuliaZB (talk) 12:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.