- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Already in Wiktionary. --Coredesat 04:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wiktionary already has this, so no need to transwiki Daniel Case 04:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; WP:NOT#DICT. --Muchness 04:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dicdef. -- Whpq 04:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Wildnox(talk) 04:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. TSO1D 04:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - dicdef already in Wiktionary. SkierRMH 05:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with nominators comments -- Bec-Thorn-Berry 06:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:WINAD, no transwiki needed. --Kinu t/c (éŕ) 06:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - transwikiied dictdef. MER-C 10:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this now seems speediable per CSD-A5. Accurizer 15:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. ~ EdBoy[c] 19:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —dima/s-ko/ 04:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NOT#DICT Orderinchaos78 04:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary per WP:NOT#DICTIONARY --Anthonycfc 19:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.