Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Winn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Winn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Govvy (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Govvy (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 13:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - not voting but WP:NFOOTBALL is biased to mens game? Says notable if they have played in a professional league. As per the wikiproject WP:FPL there are only two professional leagues for women. Others are semi pro.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 13:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's certainly huge WP:BIAS, User:Davidstewartharvey and potentially non-systemic bias as well. But in this case, I literally can't find any English-language reference at all since they left college, and even those were absolutely trivial. And in Russian, all I can find is her photo, here. There's nothing to write an article with. Nfitz (talk) 21:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

its not right. I just wanted to make the point.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 05:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the notability criteria for soccer players. Contrary to the claims above, football notability is not biased towards men, it is based on real levels of coverage since we follow actual coverage, we do not create articles on people who have never been covered in secondary sources. It also has a ludicously low level of notability, and should be scapped for something that is a little more discerning.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article about semi-pro soccer player which doesn't satisfy the GNG. There is no significant online coverage in reliable sources. Jogurney (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all of the above Spiderone 14:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.