Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenlast Boys FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Creator has been warned of creating similar additional non-notable articles. PROD removal without any type of fix does not help establish fairly strict notability requirements that this does not have. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greenlast Boys FC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD removed with no explanation.Very minor football club playing at a low level in Malaysia, the league they play in does not have its own article yet. Appears to fail WP:FOOTYN because of this and also WP:GNG as the name brings back only four hits, all WP. Potential speedy(?) but I don't know enough about the Malaysian football league structure to say for sure. Does not appear to answer in the affirmative to any of the questions posed in the useful WP:NFOOTYCLUB essay either. Fenix down (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 15:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - With reference to the Club Notability Test user essay WP:NTEST we get this result:

Q1. Has the club played in a national cup (listed in the Blue Column)? NO

Q2. Has the club played in a notable league (listed in the Yellow Column)? NO

Q3. Has the club played in a league at the next highest level (listed in the Grey Column)? NO

Q4. Is there substantial identifiable media coverage (excluding match reports) about the club in reliable independent sources? NO

Q5. Has the club played in the past in a competition of comparable status to one listed in the Blue or Yellow Columns? NO

The club therefore fails the test and should be deleted. It should be noted that there are no references in RSSSF. League Octopus (League Octopus 11:35, 22 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.