Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingo Beyer von Morgenstern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom with no delete !votes present (non-admin closure) shoy (reactions) 14:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ingo Beyer von Morgenstern

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Lack of references, no citations, mo sign of notability, unsectioned, looks like it was copypasted, and yeah not even a single link.

As WP:REF says, "Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space", then this article already violates it with the fact that here are no references. If this is such an autobigoraphy of himself or people he have relations with who is not notable, then this should be removed as per WP:AB.

The article also doesn't state any links, either within Wikipedia or not. This therefore, challenges the notability of the said person. If you search the person using Google, pages about him would appear, but the creator has not stated external links and references, as well as putting citations without any link or text.

It also has very incorrect grammar, punctualization and capitaliation. It is also unsectioned, therefore making the information very confusing as it would look like as it was one topic about Ingo Beyer von Morgenstern.

As WP:BLP says, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.", which puts the aritcle under contest for deletion as per WP:BLP | Democratics ^{Talk stat: Open} | My Guestbook Here 09:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

In the edit summary, the user says "initial outline not completed" but still, things such as this should either be made at a draftspace or a user's sandbox. He/she also dosen't have a userpage link as seen in his signature(s). (P.S, I'm not doing a sign of aggression to the user, just saying the article's ineligibilities in order to be one.)| Democratics ^{Talk stat: Open} | My Guestbook Here 10:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Keep: User has improved article since, providing accurate information and references. Thanks for complying. | Democratics ^{Talk stat: Open} | My Guestbook Here 12:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.