Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Clark (writer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 01:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Clark (writer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish that it meets WP:Notability (people). Unref blp. Boleyn (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Inadequate sources. Substantial career achievement is expected for a Wikipedia BLP. Not the case here. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Unreferenced BLP. No indication that the subject satisfies the notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is the difference between Head editor and Executive editor. According to WP:NACADEMICS, we are suppose to keep anyone who has served as a head editor.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She was chief editor of a magazine, as opposed to a journal. That MIGHT confer notability, but under a different notability standard than WP:NACADEMICS. Even so, the article is entirely unsourced and unless somebody can place some reliable sources, I would not be able to change my stance from delete. The lack of BLP sources is enough on its own to require deletion of the article at this time. If the article is sourced by reliable sources that indicate notability, I will reconsider. Safiel (talk) 17:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with all the above. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep - Not really my area but seems as though some sources around. added one but hard to sift through google....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.