Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jihadi John

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jihadi John

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY Andrei.smolnikov (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Fails WP:NOTABILITY? The identity of the man who killed James Foley is being discussed in the media over the world. The monster is nicknamed Jihadi John. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another option would be redirect and merge to a relevant section of the article about the murdered journalist. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:GNG with a cleanup. Redirection is unsuitable because a detailed discussion of Jihadi John and the technical aspects of the video are beyond the scope of James Foley's article.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is really no reason whatsoever to remove this article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JhonsJoe (talk • contribs)
Absolute Keep: Isn't this the alleged killer of James Foley? Therefore, he is (notoriously) notable. Worldedixor (talk) 15:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Surely a suspect subject to a massive international manhunt is notable enough for Wikipedia. Tomh903 (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Absolutely notable. When (and if) his true identify is known, this article can be revised or merged with the article that will surely result from that. Should be cross-referenced with James Foley and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant articles. Vertium ^{When all is said} _{and done} 19:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per above and passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They should not made more important than they are, just brutal killers. Monart (talk) 10:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "They should not made more important than they are, just brutal killers" is basically an WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has significant coverage in reliable sources, thus notable. Google News is currently returning over 32,000 results for "Jihadi John". Danrok (talk) 10:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG, there's a lot more to come. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:44, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As usual, someone quickly nominates a new article for deletion. This article, as stated above, meets the criteria of notability. Gautehuus (talk) 14:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, at least until any distinction/ link can be positively made between this name, Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary and the killer of James Foley. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.