Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemar (supermarket)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lemar (supermarket)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion request under A7 declined by nom (myself), but agree with notability concerns. Does not appear to meet the general notability guideline or the specific notability guideline for companies. Online search revealed trivial and/or promotional coverage such as this trivial source and this advertorial source, but very minimal coverage of actual supermarket chain. Appable (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 19:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 19:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I myself had reviewed and tagged this as there were no signs of any apparent notability and nothing applicably convincing. SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. for (;;) (talk) 07:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Randykitty (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Save under condition - that condition is that I get a bit more time on improving the article so it doesn't meet deletion criteria. East Anglian Regional (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment AfDs are closed after 7 days, so that gives you a week to improve the article and show that the subject is notable. --Randykitty (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@East Anglian Regional: Adding to Randy's note, AFD is not a vote, so if the article is improved significantly the comments above and my rationale for nomination may no longer apply, in which case the article will likely not be deleted. Appable (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice I have made some changes and I would like the page to be reviewed. You may have noticed that I identified the page being a stub, which I am just being honest about. So, please review and tell me if the page passes the notability test. East Anglian Regional (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough. Improving it might help but I think it still wouldn't pass. NikolaiHo 18:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Surely my edits have improved the article and have made the page notable?! I said that 'Lemar Cineplexplex' is the largest cinema chain in Northern Cyprus and included a suitable link. I am sure if someone was trying to research about Northern Cyprus, they may find this page useful?! East Anglian Regional (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Save as I have made sure and tried my absolute best to improve this article, trying to use verifiable sources (as most are promotional on the World Wide Web), so please consider this now as a suitable article. East Anglian Regional (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.