Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryland Shakespeare Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland Shakespeare Festival

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local festival. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable, secondary, substantial coverage Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2009-03 ✗ A3, 2006-11 ✗ CSD G11

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I also haven't been able to find significant coverage. Happy to revisit this if DiamondRemley39 is able identify, here or in the article, some of the coverage they've found via Newspapers.com (to which I don't have a subscription), but it would be unusual for that archive to turn up sufficient coverage to establish notability when Google turns up so little. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.