- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Muriankari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable family genealogy in violation of WP:NOTDIR. - MrX 14:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: as per nom.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 02:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-noteworthy genealogy. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. People keep trying to add their families without understanding our criteria for inclusion. Dougweller (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.