Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Otazu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Otazu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to technically satisfy WP:ATHLETE as one possibly-reliable source (BDFA) shows Otazu played 1 match in the Chilean second division. However, there is no sign this article would satisfy the general notability guideline (it has been on WP for over 1 year with no reliable sources and a search of on-line South American news sources like ABC Digital in his home country of Paraguay produce zero articles) and it has been on WP for over 1 year in this state. Let's use some common sense and remove it until the point comes that Otazu is the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources such that we can write a decent article about him. Jogurney (talk) 02:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jogurney (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - primarily fails WP:GNG, which outweighs WP:NFOOTBALL. Plenty of consensus in the past that 1/2 appearances are not enough to justify inclusion when an article fails GNG. Giant Snowman 15:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think this pretty clearly falls under the part of WP:NSPORT that says that not all articles that meet its criteria must be kept. The article only just passes WP:NSPORT, but clearly fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while it technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL, there is no indication that the subject passes the general notability guideline. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per all above. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.