Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saidmurod Davlatov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete unless further sourcing appears. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saidmurod Davlatov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently created cross-wiki by new users. I admit I'm not familiar with Russian sources, but none of these seem particularly reliable to me (nonamer sites without a ruwiki article).

Ref 1 is the list of "Top 100 most influential Muslims in Russia", where Davlatov is featured in 2 sentences, nowhere near significant coverage. Refs 2 and 3 are from Eksmo, a publishing house he works with. Ref 4 is an interview with the entry piece being overly promotional. Ref 5 is another interview. This one has "Партнерский материал" at the bottom, meaning affiliated material. Likely another promo piece. Ref 6 is from SAMO which he founded. Ref 7 is from a magazine, which you have to subscribe to if you want to read. This brochure is available on their website, which is the film poster of a movie about himself, so probably just advertising given the logos on it. Ref 8 is about the aforementioned film, which he is greatly involved in. Likely promo as well given everything. The entire thing is on YouTube with 500 views btw. Refs 9 and 10 are from a book selling site that sells his two books. Refs 11 and 12 are about a school he funded, nothing about him in particular so not SIGCOV.

Given that there are no reliable, independent and significant sources about the subject, and that this is likely self-promotion just like the sources, I believe this person does not pass the GNG and is not notable. ~StyyxTalk? 22:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.