- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Seapatrick FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Tagged for speedy deletion with the rationale, "Club does not meet WikiProject Football's notability criteria (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Notability)"; that is not a legitimate speedy criterion. Procedural nom; no opinion from me. Chick Bowen 23:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 07:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to indicate it meets WP:FOOTBALL's criteria for notability. Absent of further information, all we know is that the club plays in the second division of a regional league of a minor footballing nation. I can't see it meeting WP:N. --Ytny (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, if you promotion isn't even listed then I don't think the club needs to be listed. Govvy 14:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Dave101→talk 08:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, given the league they play in is a redlink and the article is an orphan. Qwghlm 09:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.