Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simonini Racing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simonini Racing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Rob van vee 19:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If you felt the article needed expanding all you had to do was start a discussion on the talk page, not nominate it for deletion, as it says at WP:BEFORE "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." But since you have done so I have expanded the article, added more refs and shown engine applications for notability. Since it now meets the reason you wanted fixed, you can now withdraw the nomination. - Ahunt (talk) 21:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Notification of the existence of this AfD has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. The article is supported by citations from a reliable source - a directory listing is typical of the kind of source which demonstrates notability. Google is full of it, there are news items etc. about it. It is clear that this article needs expanding, not deleting. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 21:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep They're evidently notable enough to list them in the relevant trade directories. Also, what's the intention for Category:Simonini aircraft engines and its children? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the above. Thanks to @Ahunt for improvements. Jan olieslagers (talk) 11:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing AFD (Hope that is how it's done) Reading the article again I realise my mistake in tagging it for deletion. My apologies for any inconvenience. Rob van vee 15:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.