Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slaviša Ubiparipović (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per G4 The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slaviša Ubiparipović

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As already stated on the talk page, this article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. There is no sourcing I've seen to indicate that the MISL is fully professional, and the coverage on this article consists of routine sports journalism and statistics. I think the article is still elidgible for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4, hence the tag on the article, but it has gone unadressed for two days indicating that more discussion may be necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am just wondering here, are indoor football leagues even accepted as being professional. I mean I can prove it is if it has not been already but I am just wondering. If not then yes delete. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 04:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.