Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomb Raider 3 (film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of speculation nothing concrete this article violates Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Whispering 02:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Nothing is guaranteed that the movie will come out. Mirroring nom, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Tohru Honda13Sign here! 02:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Nothing has been said about this movie coming out. Mrmoocow 02:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so until the movie is announced officially there's no reason to have an article about it. TSO1D 02:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, violates WP:CRYSTAL --Mhking 03:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 03:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Paramont website [1] has nothign about this movie as of now. SkierRMH 04:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Speculation is poor reason for nomination, as the article is not pure fancruft but based on several citations. However, I agree that the article is crystal balling, since the film is not guaranteed to be made with no director or screenwriter. Since there are genuine citations, merge to Tomb Raider series#Movies in case production does take off in the future and article can be re-formed. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 04:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom -- Bec-Thorn-Berry 06:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 10:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. ~ EdBoy[c] 19:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ← ANAS Talk? 21:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too many unknowns in the article itself, per nom Wikipedia is not a crystal ball .--Dakota 23:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Bucketsofg 01:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete until a commitment to make the film becomes concrete. --Duke of Duchess Street 03:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Hello32020 01:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.