June 19
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Laljose.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Appucoool (notify | contribs | uploads).
- source, www.directorlaljose.com does not provide any license info. Vssun (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IPhone 4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Luke Farrelly-Spain (notify | contribs | uploads).
- I'm not convinced that this non-free image of an iPhone is at all necessary. Anybody could take a photo of their own one, switched on if we want to show the interface (though the interface is already well-covered in the article anyway) and upload it... Oh, look, they have. Admittedly no free image of this particular version exists yet, because it has not been released, but it will be very soon and the free image is more than adequate. ╟─TreasuryTag►belonger─╢ 07:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Completely replaceable.—Kww(talk) 14:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now: The original reasoning given by Luke Farrelly-Spain is weak, true, and I would advocate deleting the image by that logic. However, the iPhone 4 is not in customers' hands until the 24th. So, no free alternative can be produced until then. I advocate removing the image shortly after the release date. Yonisyuumei (talk) 06:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]- For what it's worth, the release date is scheduled for before this FfD discussion will close, so if it's going to be removed before the end anyway... ╟─TreasuryTag►assemblyman─╢ 10:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, my vote is delete as normal. Yonisyuumei (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For what it's worth, the release date is scheduled for before this FfD discussion will close, so if it's going to be removed before the end anyway... ╟─TreasuryTag►assemblyman─╢ 10:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Side note: since the real deal here is the screen layout (and not the shell) wouldn't any "free" replacement be, in fact, as non-free as any screenshot of commercial software (unless it's a hack with free OS)? East of Borschov (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This has apparently been debated at length before — see the main image for the IPod Touch article:
One could make a similar argument for the iPhone. Yonisyuumei (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Please note: After lengthy discussions it has been agreed upon that an iPod Touch cannot be adequately represented without showing the home screen, and that the hardware shown is so minimal as to be unidentifiable without the software. The use of this image, freely (as in beer) available from Apple and dozens of news sites, is a complicated decision made by many editors, who ask that this image be retained, or at least thoroughly and openly discussed. Thank you.
- This has apparently been debated at length before — see the main image for the IPod Touch article:
- Keep per Yonisyuumei's argument immediately above this. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yonisyuumei (talk · contribs) argued to delete the image. ╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 21:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This isn't even close—it fails NFCC1 in spades. ÷seresin 09:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:All Saints - Pure Shores.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tchernomush (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Content of song not discussed in article. Article needs sourced commentary Dawnseeker2000 15:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- this is just File:New York City at night HDR.jpg with a logo inserted - but the logo has a copyright sign on it, the image is orphaned and has no reasonable educational value - the licensing is also false, because it adds a GNU license that is not included in the source license, as well as other cc licenses, and the image is claimed to be own - the image looks like a test Hekerui (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - incorrect license, no encyclopaedic value. AJCham 19:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Descendant chart of John Shaw and Elizabeth Willoughby.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rovington (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused PL.-Snr (talk) 21:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is original research and has no notability. – HLE (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Great House Farn - from west 1900.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rovington (notify | contribs | uploads).
- unused/ a modern image can be provided if needed PL.-Snr (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Proposed-park.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rovington (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused file & size to large for inclusion in pages PL.-Snr (talk) 21:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.