Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 8

< September 7	September 9 >

September 8

File:Whachoo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, text-only images are generally discouraged. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC06331.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filename is meaningless and it isn't used in any articles; the description doesn't allow the subject to be easily identified: it could be either Gulmit or Passu. Gyrobo (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename and if necessary, Move to Commons - Gulmit doesn't have any images, and the word "Passu Cones" evidently describes a mountain range. ----DanTD (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, file is now at Commons as Gulmit village in the Passu Cones.jpg, and DSC06331.JPG can be deleted. --Gyrobo (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it, then. ----DanTD (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southern Web Group Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted article, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to subject's lack of notability. Presumably, the image can be found online again if such a picture is desired. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Downtown Albany, GA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very low quality. A better one can be taken. Lots of blurs. This is also a personal image from my archives that I would like to be removed.166.248.67.211 (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)--166.248.67.211 (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:Downtown albany, ga.jpg to File:Downtown Albany, GA.jpg by JohnnyMrNinja (talk · contribs) at 10:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:King.of.Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License on Flickr does not allow commercial usage MGA73 (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Type of flour.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A chart of numbers, free but orphaned. Perhaps it would be useful as text, but not as an image. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until it is used as text. ----DanTD (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't mind, but I doubt it would be encyclopedic to include this chart as text in an article. (The images are not used.) Same with the ones below. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DanTD, if such information ever needs to be used as text it could be trivially recreated. –Drilnoth (T/C) 15:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Type of flour2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A chart of numbers, free but orphaned. Perhaps it would be useful as text, but not as an image. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until it is used as text. ----DanTD (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DanTD, if such information ever needs to be used as text it could be trivially recreated. –Drilnoth (T/C) 15:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Type of flour3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A chart of numbers, free but orphaned. Perhaps it would be useful as text, but not as an image. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until it is used as text. ----DanTD (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DanTD, if such information ever needs to be used as text it could be trivially recreated. –Drilnoth (T/C) 15:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bishop-ordang.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified, too low quality to be of use. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, terribly poor quality. –Drilnoth (T/C) 15:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yueyu Traditional.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to File:Yueyu.png Sven Manguard Wha? 16:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birds eye view of Lake Wylie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a screen shot from Google Earth, maps.google.com or related product. The uploader is unlikely to be the owner of the satellite that took these photos or to have the right to republish it under a Creative Commons license. Peacock (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete This is clearly a Google Earth screenshot. I've tagged the file for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#F9. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 19:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SC cityandtown Map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader of this file is a serial copyright violator and is unlikely to be the copyright owner of this image. Peacock (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Drilnoth (T/C) 15:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Narlababex.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of someone's dog. Unlikely to have any encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boys in Hanoi making string figures.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File name is meaningless, it isn't used in any article, and it is impossible to identify the subject. Gyrobo (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:DSC05258.jpg to File:Boys in Hanoi making string figures.jpg by JohnnyMrNinja (talk · contribs) at 10:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New buildings in the west of Hanoi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File name is meaningless, it isn't used in any article, and it is impossible to identify the subject. Gyrobo (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before you claim that it is impossible to identify, check contribs. People add images to use in articles, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanoi&diff=prev&oldid=130433523 It is a shame that images get deleted in this way. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:36, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:DSC05723.jpg to File:New buildings in the west of Hanoi.jpg by JohnnyMrNinja (talk · contribs) at 10:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RFL fights chart.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete File has been replaced by updated File:Rfl-matches-by-year-09.png - I am the creator of both files. Run Amok (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dennisrodmanasyaz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doubleteamdvdcapture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RedPhone.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never going to be used and way too small. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs 21:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.