Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 July 23

< July 22	July 24 >

July 23

File:Naomi Bennett.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photo with generic rationale and no reason for usage. She is not in any special sort of costume or location, and a non-free photo of the actress would work just as well. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muktiyddher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free historic political poster from around 1970. Had no substantial FUR until today; now has a minimal one that claims that "this artwork was a famously associated" with the topic of the article in question (Mukti Bahini, the irregular Bengali forces during the secession war of 1971). But this association is not discussed in the article. In fact the image isn't mentioned at all, let alone critically discussed, in the article except for the caption (which merely states briefly what it is), and there isn't any sourcing about it either. Seems purely decorative use, NFCC#8 failure. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EconomicFlywheel.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally nominated at MFD by Carrite. His rationale follows:

While very pretty, the content of this graphic is nonsensical original research. Here's the purported description: "Graphs of Oil Supply Growth, GDP Growth and Disposable Energy." Ummm, no, that's not what that is at all. Here's the purported source: "Calculated and integrated into graphics from US Government published reports." There are no calculations, there is nothing to be integrated into unnamed published reports by unnamed branches of the "US Government." The content itself is completely, for lack of a better phrase, wack: "As Disposable Energy (?!?) increases, more Labor is needed to apply Work (?!?!?) and Economic Momentum (?!?!??) builds..." etc., with the POV sophism "Frugal government burdens least/Government growth adds drag" over the top, as if it that relates to anything. "Size equates to momentum" is equally meaningless... In short, this is a well made illustration, to be sure, but the purported content is 100% pure OR. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving this here, Mr. Hammer. Carrite (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Proud; Purgatorio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned self-created art --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 19:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Monkeyface eel certificate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image without a foreseeable use --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 20:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen a certificate like that. If it's free, it should go to Commons. It could illustrate a number of articles about fishing or licences. --Mareklug ^talk 03:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mageba-bulach.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a building in Switzerland, which has freedom of panorama according to Commons:COM:FOP#Switzerland so no reason why a free image can't be created. January (talk) 21:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Powergirl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unencyclopedic, hentai. Extremophile (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete publicly released unlicensed derivative material of copyrighted source material (DC Comics characters) So this is a copyright violation. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 06:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hopkins-JAH-1917.tiff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, superseded by File:Hopkins-JAH-1917.jpg, no need to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - I'm the creator. I uploaded the TIFF on accident, then ran up the JPG which I used. Carrite (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.