Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 June 21

< June 20	June 22 >

June 21

File:Doing what I do.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User page image only used on a talk page, with unacceptable license conditions. —innotata 01:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1392.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Patsajakvideoform.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free image, duplicative with the actual public domain image of Mr. Sajak on the Wheel of Fortune set (also found in the article). RJaguar3 | u | t 06:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Proposed MD-XX.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image of a proposed variant of an aircraft, of which we already have free images. the small differences, as can be seen in this image, are both describable with text and do not significantly add to reader's understanding of the topic. Peripitus (Talk) 11:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, we do not have any other photos of the MD-XX proposed design, it serves a purpose to illustrate it. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All images serve a purpose. How does this ones purpose significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic ? - Peripitus (Talk) 09:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same way ANY illustration does, to show the design of the aircraft. Do we need pictures of 747s on the article for that plane? No, you can ind that all over the web, but we choose to do so because it adds to the article. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm neutral on this, provided the image remains at reduced size to comply with NFC requirements. Boeing is the current holder of McDonnell Douglas' copyright, trademark and patent libraries. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 00:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lee WestwicksPhoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that simply shows that he was in the magazine. Adds little to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.