Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 16

< April 15	April 17 >

April 16

File:Korean Ferry Sewol Capsized, 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from List of shipwrecks in 2014. — ξ ^xplicit 10:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is used in two articles, including Sinking of MV Sewol. Use in both articles may be excessive; the image should be used in just one article. George Ho (talk) 01:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that using it in the list article may be problematic under WP:NFCC#8; is the topic of the article ("here's a list of all shipwrecks in 2014") impaired in its understanding if it were removed from there? I don't think so.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, fails contextual significance (and minimal use) in the article List of shipwrecks in 2014. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling - Dionne Warwick.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is of the French vinyl release. I replaced it with the U.S. image to represent the singer's most intended audience. George Ho (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marble Burying Set Up.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the links provided this image is BY-NC-SA at best, not BY as tagged. BethNaught (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see the website's own text says, "for any reasonable non-commercial purpose". Wikipedia requires licenses which permit commercial use. BethNaught thanks for catching this. Arsalanm110 - you seem like a new user. Do you understand why this is being proposed for deletion? Do you see at the journal site that commercial use is prohibited? Do you dispute this or have any comment? Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that 15:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsalanm110 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit right arm est1214a.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is an identical-looking version of this file on Commons under the same name but with different SHA-1 hash and different uploader. Wonder if the local copy should simply be discarded or copied over in some way. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Lantivo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of a fictitious country, used in a deleted user page. No encyclopedic value. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:

File:Flag of Ravgendia.svg (delete | talk | history | links |

File:Coat of Arms of Ravgendia.svg (delete | talk | history | links |

Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QueensMinorLeagueGame.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Picture seems to be taken from off a screen. Possible copyright issues? ViperSnake151 Talk 16:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACTmap.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image, in its use, is not discussed in the article and has questionable relevance ViperSnake151 Talk 18:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claire Colinet chryselephantine statue.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claire Colinet chryselephantine statue.PNG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would this file meet NFCC#8 if kept as fair use? There is some discussion on her works on the article.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claire Colinet signature.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claire Colinet signature.PNG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the underlying work here {{PD-text}}? Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Houston Heights Woman's Historical Texas Landmark ,February 2016.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Houston Heights Woman's Historical Texas Landmark ,February 2016.jpeg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 20:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with maybe a different rationale. For what it's worth: "The content of all material on this web site is copyrighted by the Texas Historical Commission (THC) unless otherwise indicated. Permission to copy, distribute, or use in whole or part for any non-commercial purpose without fee is hereby granted provided that the information (files, documents, or photographs) is credited to the THC. - See more at: http://www.thc.state.tx.us/thc-copyright#sthash.tuPDn7o1.dpuf" – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is invalid rationale to keep the image; non-commercial licenses are forbidden on Wikipedia -FASTILY 00:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unless they mean a non-free rationale. Personally, I don't think it would meet the criteria, so delete. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oleg sock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 20#File:Oleg sock.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 13:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The permission does not look like a valid one. --ᛒᚨᛊᛖ (ᛏᚨᛚᚲ) 23:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lord. A friend made this picture of me at a party and gave it to me. Been here for 10 years. I don't even recall who among of all my buddies made it. What should I do now to not have this picture wiped? :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your friend needs to get in touch with WP:OTRS and declare the file to be under a Wikipedia-compatible free license -FASTILY 00:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't recall who that person was. That was in grad school, everybody is scattered anyway, it has been 10 years. Look, people, I know what OTRS is about, I used that myself. This is a lame picture of me, a Wikipedia editor, made by some buddy of mine I don't remember, given to me, and in the User namespace. Let's not be ridiculous and focus our efforts on things more worthy of our time. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.