Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

December 31

File:Addis new.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality orphan image without reason for use Snowycats (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ahmadreza Abedzade OC.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality orphan image without reason for use Snowycats (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Airportx.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality orphan image, other ExpressJet pictures that are a bit more modern and higher resolution exist Snowycats (talk) 00:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marriage certificate of Philip Mountbatten and Elizabeth Windsor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Per the point made by Celia Homeford and in the PD-UKGov template about Crown copyright enforcement applying UK standards even in places where they'd be entitled for longer copyright protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The marriage license of is Philip Mountbatten and Elizabeth Windsor supposed to have expired in 1997 or 1998 per UK Crown copyright, which is typically 50 years after first UK publication for UK governmental works. Regardless, I believe that the license may be still copyrighted in the US per URAA restoration in 1996, so the US copyright may last until 2043, ninety-five years after first UK publication ([1]). If it were still copyrighted in the US, how the license complies with WP:NFCC can be interpreted. Currently, the image is used in "Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten"; I'm uncertain whether the license helps improve readers' understanding of the wedding (or marriage) itself. If it does, then the image should be relicensed as fair use. If, otherwise, it fails WP:NFCC#8, then it should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 00:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Template:PD-UKGov says that the expiry of Crown copyright applies worldwide. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else still have issues with enforcing URAA already? Expiration of the certificate's UK copyright doesn't affect its US copyright unless there's proof that it was publicized or published in the US within 30 days after its first publication in the UK. George Ho (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. as per Celia Homeford (talk) --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Somerset Flag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

low-quality reproduction of flag available at File:Somnew.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonnyb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

low-res compilation of images from unknown sources. Copyright status of source images is ambiguous. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonyajohnny1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

low-res file, no metadata - unlikely to be uploader's own work. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Therr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too low in resolution and quality to be of realistic encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Therr2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too low in resolution and quality to be of realistic encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soorama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too low in resolution and quality to be of realistic encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered using PROD for stuff like this? Salavat (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eric Karjaluoto (AIGA Y Conference in San Diego. March 28, 2008).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

non-notable individual, no encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaizen Sports & Fittness.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable company, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malabar Army New Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

used in speedily-deleted article Malabar Army. No other foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malabar Army unvailing Banner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

used in speedily-deleted article Malabar Army. No other foreseeable encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malabar Army Kerala.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

used in speedily-deleted article Malabar Army. No other foreseeable encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:City hall.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically, the photo the user is using to promote their business is overexposed and of low-quality. "All Rights Reserved" also conflicts with the CC license. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lincolnsmith toothbrush.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 02:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2018 Baraboo High boys junior prom group.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BLP, I’ve removed this from the page in question, so it is likely to be deleted anyway as it’s non-free, but also bringing it here: this is an image of minors who made a dumb mistake, this is already plastered over the internet, but it will eventually die down. What will jot die down will be this image on the 5th most visited website in the world. We need a strong reason to host such inflammatory conduct by identifiable living minors, and for such a minor article, I do not believe it exists. As such, the outcome most in line with the BLP policy is deletion of this file. Also, I didn’t realize before nominating that this had been nominated recently, but that discussion only looked at NFCC and not the very real BLP issues here.TonyBallioni (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR Dancer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR Melbourne Exterior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birmingham Extreme Main Stage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR London Bar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR Dancer w-Black Rhino Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR Van Nuys Lounge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR corporate hallway in Norco, CA..jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SR Torrance Exterior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Torrance bar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birmextreme ex.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, set of images includes metadata from 5-6 different cameras and comments like "1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved". Uploader does not appear to have the rights to release the images under a Creative Commons license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bf0x guitar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personal file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use, only used in userpage from editor with no non-userspace edits. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Staples Richmond BC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

photo is from an angle and stylized in a way that makes it practically unusable. no encyclopedic value. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered PROD as an alternative to FFD? Salavat (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hack video game soundtrack album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in .hack (video game series)#Music. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim and Cathy Justice.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jim and Cathy Justice.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vintageskipper.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toys are considered art in terms of copyright - see commons:TOYS Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stacie.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toys are considered art in terms of copyright - see commons:TOYS Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statscan logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Statistics Canada logo.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SteinBuil.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:SteinBuilding.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to JPG file. Salavat (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dennis Landfall 2005-07-10.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irma moves through Florida 2017 09 10.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irma Moves Through Florida 2017-09-10.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katrina 25-26Aug05 kamx.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael 10Oct18.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wilma Landfall in Florida 2005-10-24.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Brian McNoldy Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scharwenka2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scharwenka2 Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Venera9.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. The image is not being used as the primary means of visual identification (contrary to the NFUR) and is not discussed in Venus. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: File was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 8#File:Venera9.png and kept in Venus as a result. I'm just pointing this out for reference and am not !voting either way at this time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.