Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 19

April 19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weyes Blood on Boat Sub Pop 2019.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sam carman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

portrait/promotional image of notable individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 07:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - EXIF shows the author as Kathryn Vetter Miller. Unless the uploader can verify this via OTRS, then this is a copyvio. -- Whpq (talk) 13:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'd like to give the uploader the benefit of the doubt, but given that the uploader also has an image on Commons similarly claimed as "own work" that is up for speedy deletion due to copyvio concerns, I suspect that the license of the image under discussion isn't valid either. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peggy O'Keefe Glasgow Royal Concert Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Levrad (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

portrait/promotional image of notable individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 07:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by JJMC89 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barof Film Poster.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sohel1997 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Clearly bogus license, a movie poster is not uploader's "own work". I can't find a source for it via google images though. funplussmart (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:Kidnap official poster.jpeg and File:Password Film Poster.jpg which have the same problems. Plus probably everything else uploaded by this editor. Per this post they made, I think it's confusion on the licensing and it can be resolved but there are COI / PAID concerns now. Ravensfire (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coke Studio for the deaf.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nauriya (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image being used "to serve as the primary means of visual identification in the relevant section of the article". As this is a section of the article, the purpose of visual identification by itself is insufficient to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horace on mic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Horace Hamilton Heidt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low resolution derivative image of File:Horace Heidt 1937.JPG. There's no real need to remove the background, and certainly no need to size it down this small in the process. Whpq (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.