Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 September 7

September 7

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turntable-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GaryEH (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, low-resolution, not useful. CptViraj (📧) 07:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:USC Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theo's Little Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete The file is a poster commemorating the dissolution of Ulster Special Constabulary. However, the image is just an illustration, and can be replaced by text easily without any adverse effects. Therefore the file may be a violation of WP:NFCC#8. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be to assume that WP is already complete and correct. A better question, for the purposes of deleting resources like this, is whether such sourced critical commentary of them is available and can be added to the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The only relevant assumption here is WP:NFCCE: "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created". – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 20:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's just a rationale (which it has), not requiring an article to be rewritten. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdraw. Thanks Andy Dingley for adding the license information and the link to Commons. :) (non-admin closure) Masum Reza📞 19:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little marrone.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pzhanik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not sure where in Commons the original file is located. The pd-because tag is invalid, and needs to be replaced. Masum Reza📞 19:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.