Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 28

< February 27	March 1 >

February 28

File:CFN-CNBC logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Former logo who non-free use in Class CNBC completely fails WP:NFCC#8 (see WP:NFCC#CS and WP:NFC#cite_note-4 for more specifics). It should be noted that this file was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2020 August 14#File:CFN-CNBC logo.png and actually deleted by Fastily, but was later restored by RoySmith per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 September 5 for reasons more related to the behavior of the editor who nominated the file for deletion that to the actual non-free use of the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cathay Williams Only Woman Buffalo Soldier U.S. Army.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An IP added a comment This information is incorrect. It was commissioned by a private committee and provided to the U.S. Army for public use on their website. It was not created by a public employee. It is not in the public domain. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Postal2-Jesus-Rank.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. The article does not even mention this let alone have sourced critical commentary about it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination since I'm not seeing anything in the article which might be considered to establish the contextual significance required by NFCC#8. In addition, there might also be a WP:FREER and MOS:TEXTASIMAGES problem even if sourced commentary about the screenshot is added to the article since it's bascially nothing more than text and text can be represented in other ways in the article (e.g. as a quote perhaps). -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.