July 3
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Consensus here indicates that this likely meets the threshold of originality to be non-free. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Railway Tie Association Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Singinginmycar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Pretty sure the tree puts this logo above the threshold of originality. Putting it here for discussion as it is also used outside the article space. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 00:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Relicense/or... The RTA has been around in that name since 1932. I can find no specific mention in the copyright or trademark offices for "railway tie association", but it is a reasonable guess that the logo predates the cutoff dates necessary to retain copyright. That said, even if it is copyrighted and/or this is a more recent creation, a FUR would be appropriate in the parent article as the identifying logo of the organization. Absent any clarification, the latter is the appropriate option. Buffs (talk) 02:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 July 28. (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 13:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Vince Barnett.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
