Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 26

< May 25	May 27 >

May 26

File:DUNKIRK1940.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are other equivalen, free use images of the Dunkirk evacuation e.g. File:Dunkirksoldier1.JPG, File:Dunkirk 26-29 May 1940 NYP68075.jpg, File:Wounded British soldiers evacuated from Dunkirk make their way up the gangplank from a destroyer at Dover, 31 May 1940. H1623.jpg. As such, this non free image fails WP:NFCC#1 Joseph2302 (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it fails WP:NFCC#1. House Blaster^talk 15:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kids exercising.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Likely Flickrwashed image, taken from https://golocalgeorgesriver.com.au/listings/rugbytots-georges-river-the-shire/ Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 13:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GOT-5x09-HarpyAttack.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free screenshot is being used to "visually represent the episode in a way words cannot, by demonstrating an aesthetically or narratively significant moment.", but the image is not actually the subject of any significant sourced critical commentary. It's use is decorative and its removal is not detrimental to the reader's understanding of the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Captain Price MWII.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New high definition image uploaded for use on Captain Price. I believe this image would fail 3.a and 8, as the older image from a previous game suffices and this version of the character is not sufficiently different nor will the reader gain any understanding of the subject from it's inclusion. Once downsized, the image will show even less difference with the older image. -- ferret (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how these images violate either 3.a or 8. The reboot version of the character is entirely different from the original, even taking into consideration minor plot details that were briefly mentioned. 404Violet (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content of the plots and how the character's differ in the story is irrelevant. The character's imagery is clearly near identical, down to same hair cuts, same eye colors, facial hair, hat, etc. Additionally, the images are low quality crops from marketing materials, with various overlays, maps and other artifacts included. -- ferret (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The difference is not significant enough to merit the use of two images to depict the character. This new image also shows less of his body. The original image could even be increased in size a bit while still not breaking Wikipedia policy for size. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soap MacTavish MWII.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New high definition image uploaded for use on Soap MacTavish. I believe this image would fail 3.a and 8, as the older image from a previous game suffices and this version of the character is not sufficiently different nor will the reader gain any understanding of the subject from it's inclusion. Once downsized, the image will show even less difference with the older image. -- ferret (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how these images violate either 3.a or 8. The reboot version of the character is entirely different from the original, even taking into consideration minor plot details that were briefly mentioned. 404Violet (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content of the plots and how the character's differ in the story is irrelevant. The character's imagery is clearly near identical, down to same hair cuts, same eye colors, facial hair, etc. Additionally, the images are low quality crops from marketing materials, with various overlays, maps and other artifacts included. -- ferret (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The difference is not significant enough to merit the use of two images to depict the character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghost MWII.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New high definition image uploaded for use on Ghost (Call of Duty). I believe this image would fail 3.a and 8, as the older image from a previous game suffices and this version of the character is not sufficiently different nor will the reader gain any understanding of the subject from it's inclusion. Once downsized, the image will show even less difference with the older image. -- ferret (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how these images violate either 3.a or 8. The reboot version of the character is entirely different from the original. This character in particular especially should not violate 8 because Ghost's character design in the reboot is radically altered from his original appearance. 404Violet (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content of the plots and how the character's differ in the story is irrelevant. The character's imagery is clearly near identical, primarily in this case the "signature" balaclava. Additionally, the images are low quality crops from marketing materials, with various overlays, maps and other artifacts included. -- ferret (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Since the article got redirected, it is an orphaned fair-use image. And I agree that the article was not sufficiently improved enough to demonstrate standalone notability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#7. House Blaster^talk 15:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NJI Fantasy Currency.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image of a fantasy currency from 2012 without evidence of an appropriate license. Not the subject of commentary in an article to warrant fair-use. Imzadi 1979 → 23:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have nominated the file for speedy deletion as it lacks a source/license per WP:F4. If one is provided, I would be happy to revisit this. House Blaster^talk 15:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kemosabe Records Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free logo and redundant to File:Kemosabe Record Logo.png. Salavat (talk) 06:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.