Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 May 28

May 28

File:Medical Information Bureau 2017 No-Record Letter With Redactions.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medical Information Bureau 2017 No-Record Letter With Redactions.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8; the image is unreadable as rendered in the article and readers are not going to manually digest pages of legalese. This file does not need to be hosted here to be cited as a source, if that is the intent. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete makes the article harder to understand. Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darrell Brooks mugshot 2021-11-23.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete by User:Explicit. (non-admin closure) Heart ^(talk) 04:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements. The person in the image is still alive so a free image is possible. Additionally the image is used in an article where the person is not the primary focus so even after the person's death a non-free image would not be appropriate as it is used now. Bruxton (talk) 02:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Whatever. Better kill this mug shot too, as it looks to be exactly the same situation. ―Mandruss ☎ 09:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Florida has a unique situation when it comes to mug shots {{PD-FLGov}}. Bruxton (talk) 13:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. ―Mandruss ☎ 13:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clear-cut case of “no unfree media for living persons” Dronebogus (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.