May 6

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JackLelivelt.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

While this image is fine from a licensing perspective, it's small, low-quality, and no longer available on the source site. Furthermore, we now have better photos of this person. I'm reluctant to move it to Commons without a valid source link. holly {chat} 00:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbara Robison.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheGracefulSlick (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The statement "I own the image from my personal collection" doesn't really state this person is the copyright holder. What does it mean that they own this in their personal collection? The image looks to be a newspaper or magazine scan. Owning the newspaper or magazine does not mean they own the copyright to the image. There is also the claim "This is the first time I have uploaded the image to the internet." The upload date is March 16, 2015 but this tribute page uses the image from as early as 2013 predating the upload here. The claim of being the copyright holder is very dubious. Whpq (talk) 01:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete because, given the information we currently have, it's more likely than not a scan from a magazine or newspaper like you suggested. That would also explain why it appears in another website.
The Quirky Kitty (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.