Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Closing even though I commented, as my comment didn't concern whether or not the page should be kept or deleted, and consensus is unanimously for deletion. Zero objection to undoing the close if anyone objects. ♠PMC(talk) 19:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Abandoned draft. WP:G13 declined despite 6 month deadline. 10Eleventeen 19:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G13 only applies to userspace drafts which have been submitted to AfC; this one has not, so Godsy was perfectly correct to decline the G13. ♠PMC(talk) 19:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:STALE:

For userspace drafts where notability is unlikely to be achieved, consensus is that they should not be kept indefinitely. However, the community did not arrive at a specified time duration.

And it already exists at Bitconnect. 10Eleventeen 19:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm familiar with STALE, thanks; it has nothing to do with eligibility for G13. Stale userspace drafts can be a) redirected to the mainspace version if it exists, b) blanked with {{inactive userpage blanked}} if the user is also inactive, or c) debated at MfD, but they specifically cannot be G13'd unless the userspace draft in question has first been submitted to AfC. As this one was never submitted to AfC, it cannot be G13'd. Therefore, again, Godsy was correct to remove the template. ♠PMC(talk) 19:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.