Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sdruvss/Archive

< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations‎ | Sdruvss



Sdruvss

Sdruvss (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 23 2009, 03:47 (UTC)
edit
Suspected sockpuppets
edit
Evidence submitted by Spike Wilbury
edit

Sdruvss (talk · contribs) is a single-purpose account that has been arguing for certain "facts" to be included in Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907. His entire history consists only of arguing at Talk:Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 and now at the BLP noticeboard. I attempted to engage him about his seemingly unerring interest in solely this topic, but he declined to respond. Recently, another SPA, Wiki2wk (talk · contribs), has appeared to mysteriously back up Sdruvss; his only two contributions are here and here. I believe Sdruvss is using socks to creating the appearance of support for his position. Spike Wilbury (talk) 03:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties
edit

I didn't answered earlier this "investigation" because I didn't notice it. I'm not a heavy user of WP. Sdruvss (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crum said: "Also, to clarify, this was a low traffic talk page, esp. after the FA promotion, and the suspected SPAs all appeared at roughly the same time." Yes, this is absolutely true. I have just read this article, few weeks ago, found so many mistakes, unreliable sources, partisan, biased, that this made me write in Talk Pages that it is a extremely low quality article that shouldn't receive FA promotion. This article seems an annex to Joe Sharkey blog. Sdruvss (talk) 14:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit
  • Sdruvss said: "I think you should investigate Crum375 and the manipulation of this article. I'm a victim of his strategies. He is using this kind of manipulation to say I have puppets when is he who is creating the puppets. He is known in internet by these strategies.". That's a serious accusation. You should have evidence to back that up. I was a major contributor to this article early on and I don't see anything in this article that would make it analogous to Joe Sharkey's blog. I would've been the first to edit it if that was the case - Sharkey's reports are indeed heavily biased and anything other than his first-person account of the moment of the accident itself doesn't belong in the article. From what I see, the article gives equal weight to the findings by the NTSB and CENIPA and doesn't seem to be biased in any way. XXX antiuser 19:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • My comments are based in an internet search. I apologize, if they are false. And it is not an accusation, it is just a request to be investigated, as I am been investigated. Sdruvss (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit
Checkuser request – code letter: C (Vote stacking affecting outcome )
Current status –   Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention. If these are socks, I'm not sure who they would be socks of (whether it would be of User:Sdruvss or possibly somebody else entirely. CU could help here. –MuZemike 21:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s).   No comment with respect to IP address(es). J.delanoygabsadds 17:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
edit
  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sdruvss/Archive&oldid=1141879487"