User talk:Romartus/Archive2

what happens below here ?

FAIL

You're supposed to remove the redirect! Also, I have raped your talkpage. It's innocence is forever lost. -- yellow-bellied Ape (sniff) (Riot Porn) 22:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for making my article a feature

It's about fucking time.

—Thanks

---

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! It BURRRRNSSS!

Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildy

---

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my motherfucking article.

You are clearly a badass motherfucker.

—Guildy

---

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Dead Dick is Alive

Bro! I made a lot of changes based on your feed back and others. Please have another look, you might reconsider now. Removed repetition, and toned down the "Dead Dick" mention (like changed "Dead Dick Game to read Dick Head Game). Anyway, thanks for reading and commenting. It's an anti-war statement. Much appreciated either way. Y/s--Funnybony 20:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

OK I will check it again. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

VFH

I'm going to be completely honest with you, most of the featured content sucks. Not like it's awful, but it just isn't funny. Sure it all reads well and has hundreds of pictures pictures, but at the end of the day is that really how you get featured on a site that's supposed to be about satire and humor, it shouldn't be. Legolas11 20:24 August 27, 2009.

I think you are approaching this from the wrong angle. What ever you want to write about is your own concern though obviously the aim should be to make it funny. On this site , as long as the article is complete , makes sense (or illogical sense perhaps) and is well thought out and written , it will stay on uncyclopedia. However to make the jump to a VFH , it will then need to appeal to other contributors to gain their votes . So this is why something Pee Review is so useful as it allows a writer to put something in the queue to see how other contributors can read it before launching it out as a VFH possibility. Feedback is important as it will often make you think about what you are attempting to say. So far in my own case, I haven't felt anything I have written is quite there yet and if I look at pieces I have done and still want to tinker with them , then that shows me they are on one level incomplete.

Regarding the quality of articles going up for VFH and succeeding , that is up to those who contribute here. Besides writing your own work , join in the conversations about other articles as well. I personally find the arguments about VFH and VFD very interesting and always like to contribute - even when other contributors don't like what I write. However it a useful experience in my view so I will suggest 'hang around' and don't get too bothered about this VFH business. Just carry on writing and sharpening your skills there. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

My two cents. Matt and Trey, the guys who do South Park, created a show that was funny and had genuine appeal not because they sat down and said "Let's write a funny show" but because they kept trying to make each other laugh. Don't worry about VFH - if you make something funny it will be picked up and it will be voted for. And remember, humour is like beauty - eye of the beholder! Pup t 07:44, 28/08/2009

Thank You!!

Jonathan would like to thank you for your support on his difficult journey to finding the answer to his genetical gender issues. Have this shiny template to remind you of your unconditional love for poultry ...

Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 14:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Oregon Trail

The Oregon Trail Society

would like to thank you for your support of UnBooks:An Authentic Journal of Travelers on the Oregon Trail. Here, in return, is a copy of the only color colour photograph of the "traffic jelly" at South Pass.
Just make sure you don't lose it while you cross the river.

---

A belated token of gratitude. Thanks! Sir MacMania GUN—[21:48 3 Sep 2009]

Thanks!

'Sincere Thanks'

Thank you very much for helping to make me August 2009's Writer of the Month.

This is hands down one of the best moments I've had on Uncyclopedia. And you helped make it possible. Thank you.

• • • Necropaxx (T) {~}

---

Funny story, I'm settled in Provo now, so my access is now normal. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:59, Sep 3

Brooke Shields "Pour encourager les autres"

User:Miley Spears/Vote Brooke Shields Thanks for voting for my Uncyclopedic article "to encourage the others!" DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:44, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

Prehistoric Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for making my article a feature

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:25, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

---

Thanking you for your vote on Psyché

User:POTR/Psyche Pup t 22:26, 8/09/2009

Thank you from the trainyards

User:POTR/ITTE Pup

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my soon-to-be featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:30, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

---

Your Userpage...

...is decidedly minimalist. What's up with that? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:44, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

Uncluttered also..and well..I don't know , the enthusiasm has waned of late. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:38, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

I see. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:08, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

A miserable thanks

Thank you for making UnScripts:Les Misérables, Abrégés the miserable feature attraction for September 14!

As the French version of the musical says:
À la grande misère du peuple
Et à l'absence de la joie
Remplis ton cœur d'un vin très triste
Et à demain, ami désolé.
Nous voulons faire la guerre
Contre notre gouvernement
Pour illuminer notre terre
Malgré que probablement nous mourrons en faisant cela parce que nous ne pourrons jamais être heureux puisque cette intrigue se fixe sur la misère incessante qui vient de l'injustice sociale dont nous souffrons
These thank-you templates get harder to write every time, don't they? Really, it's quite a miserable predicament.

---

Thank you for supporting! (In case you need a translation, here's one, although your spaces before question marks and exclamation marks arouses suspicion that you would not need one.) Sir MacMania GUN—[21:03 14 Sep 2009]

You complimentary template sir

Hey Look! It's only filled with happy sand guys!! I swear to god, we're going to lose this war if Hitler keeps sending me on these ridiculous wild goose chases. We wasted a whole year running around Europe to look for the Spear of Destiny and all we found was a bunch of people who claimed to own it. We must have killed fifty people and all we have is a truck full of worthless, rusty spear heads and rotting wooden poles to show for it! Now it looks like we'll be spending 1942 finding out how many people have an Ark of the Covenant and collecting a pile of dusty, acacia wood furniture for the Fuhrer in the process. This is not why I became a Nazi. The bling with all the swastikas is nice but I look like Black Leather Jacket Dork when I'm standing here in this dark, musty craphole with the likes of Captain Doofus and Towel Head Priest Guy!

Thanks for the thumbs up, this was really one of my favorites.--    12:53, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch on Baby Boomers

Hi Romartus! Because of you the article has gotten way better. I could see your point. Cheers!!!--125.24.130.207 23:25, September 21, 2009 (UTC)

Marble Thanks

John Smith would like to thank you! For Helping him get through Marble Madness and defeat the evil bully, Benny Smith (no relation).

   Orian57    Talk   00:24 23 September 2009

Thanks!

My little grey cells, zey 'ave solved ze case! Necropaxx would very much like to thank you for uncovering who the real murderer was. "If not for your 'elp, mon ami, I fear zat Monsieur Murderer might 'ave escaped." Double thanks for making this my tenth feature! Woo!

• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:34, Sep 24

A word from your new insect computer WotM

Thank you so much

for supporting my nomination for Writer of the Month.

I would like to take this opportunity to announce my shift away from writing. The reason is very simple.

As the intelligence of the average Internet user has exponentially decayed, Internet media in general has seen major paradigm shifts, from newsgroups to webcomics to lolcats. Clearly writing is dying, and Photoshop is taking its place. Visual puns such as the one at left are just as funny, and take massively less effort.
Get it? MacMania? A Macintosh wearing a Scottish kilt (because the username begins with "Mac") gone mad (and therefore transformed into a Dalek)? Oh, forget it, I'm sticking to writing.

---

Thanks for the vote! Sir MacMania GUN—[00:34 2 Oct 2009]

Sun Bee

Thanks for voting for on Sun Bee. You posted "For. Just about stays on the subject of the article though has a few close random encounters along the way." If you have the time, I'd be interested in knowing what parts you mean. I don't know if I'm allowed to edit a VFH-nommed article for more than a couple minor grammar fixes, but if this doesn't get featured I'd like to know how I can improve it. Thanks. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  14:03, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

• I voted for because it held together to the end. I wasn't sure about the Homo Sapiens/Neanderthal section as I felt the story was going on about them too much and diverting it . I have re-read it again since you posted this message and on reflection it wasn't so much random as deviation perhaps which isn't so bad. It is very easy to head off into different directions with an article (I have done it myself enough times) as there is always the temptation to throw in a lot of ideas . So to sum perhaps a bit more about the Sun Bee and less about early man should have been the main focus...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 15:57, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I never conceived of Sun Bees apart from the effect they and wolves/dogs had on H. sapiens and H. neanderthalis. The article's actually based on a joke email I sent to a friend of mine who's an entomologist who saw the movie Bug with me (in that movie, cockroaches start fires with their rear antennae--that's the only thing I believe I used from that movie). Other than the completely imaginary bees, most of the article is based on actual history and scientific thought. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:40, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

• • Appreciate the background to why the story was written. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:06, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Sure. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:56, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome

Thanks for your message! As you can see on my user page, I was kicking around quietly for two months before I decided to speak before your High Councils. (That's how it's done here in New Hampshire, although the standard wait is 20 years.) PS--I quoted you recently--your successful vote to delete In Flames and your citation of its bad English--as evidence toward my recent attempt to change policy to further discourage bad English, in Forum:Encyclopedia cliches. Spıke ¬  17:02, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Romartus' bee says

User:Why do I need to provide this?/Sun Bee thanks King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:44, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Biggus Dickus

I didn't change anything back; the original edits were mine and I completely screwed-up the timeline (which is supposed to correspond with Biggus Dickus the Monty Python character) because I forgot that Tiberius was emperor during Christ's life in Judea and somehow thought it was Nero (which, being an amateur historian of sorts is a bit of an embarrassing mistake). I've been meaning to re-write it for ages but I was too lazy and kept thinking it would be too difficult (in the event it wasn't because I was able to keep all the details and just change a few things, not completely rewrite it as I'd feared) --Zarbag 16:31, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

Che vive

Love, User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig3 and WHERE brooklyn at??? 00:47, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

I don't get you sometimes, man!

So this is too scruffy for VFH and needs tidying up, but this and this are fine? My brow is lightly furrowed with puzzlement here! Don't get me wrong, this isn't me trying to get you to change or even reconsider your vote - you cast it, you're entitled to it, and I'm cool with it. I'm not here to argue the toss or cause drama. But I would like to know why you seem to think Lobster is scruffier than either of those other two articles, just for the sake of knowing, really! --UU - natter 11:10, Oct 22

When I look at some of the stuff that gets the nod to go on VFH , I didn't think Cricket or the Al Pacino School of Shouting were too bad. I did suggest on the Pacino one that the the middle section dialogue should be cut but decided to go a vote for anyway. Cricket was also perhaps too long as well but it was a fair stab at a story and to make it comprehensible to non-cricket fans. So really I was wanting to encourage the contributors with those but may be less generous in future.

The problem with the lobster article was the self reference asides to this website and the general 'look, I am talking to you dear reader/moron/etc' style which is a heavily overworked approach a lot of contributors resort to. I have done myself in the past so I now know how lame that really is now unless it can be taken to another level.

Also as you and Matt Lobster are both experienced writers here , I thought the entire piece was indeed scruffy and a bit shoddy. There is a funny article in there - it is just covered in limpet ideas in my view right now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:25, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Matt had nothing to do with it: Cajek and Gerry did. Just for the record. Oh, hang on - I mentioned that in the nom. And experience has nothing to do with anything - either an article is fit for the front page, or it isn't, doesn't matter how experienced the writers are. And if you're trying to tell me the Cricket article is more coherent and less scruffy than Lobster, then I say you are guilty of some heavy double standards - if Cricket and Al Pacino aren't too scruffy, then neither is Lobster. If your problem is with the more conversational tone of the article, well that's different - that's a personal issue and I totally respect your right to that opinion. But don't go using "scruffy" as a reason when you're voting in favour of scruffier articles! (Still not trying to get you to change your vote, just more puzzled than ever). Final protip: "shoddy" and "lame" aren't the friendliest of words to go using - I was asking a friendly question, and that's just put my nose right out of joint, hence this reply might come across as slightly peeved. --UU - natter 12:54, Oct 22

But what does any of this me? Nothing obviously. So why am I even mentioning it? Cos I'm a dick. That's why. Romartus' votes have often confused me I must admit. Still virility is the spice of life. Was that variety. No it was the worms. Oh, a friend of mine claims that he has seen WORMS, like real garden worms standing up out the ground his garden. Like sticking up REALLY far out of the ground. When there was a full moon. He says he's seen it twice, and when he moves towards them they shoot back down under the ground. Loads of them. MrN 13:05, Oct 22

And I'm guilty of double standards as well, because I just noticed I voted against an article calling it ugly. It is ugly, but I didn't need to put it like that. I must be stressed. I'm gonna go ban Cajek to calm down. The point of this? I just get confused when I see what I consider to be blatantly contradictory votes, TBH. My question would have been the same had I never edited the Lobster article in my life. I guess I just think about things too much. --UU - natter 13:16, Oct 22

OK 'shoddy' and 'lame' are too strong . I am happy to withdraw those comments. As for double standards , I admitted in the earlier reply that I was perhaps being overgenerous with the Al Pacino and Cricket articles . Ideally, yes all articles should be voted on their merits - whether they are written by you , me, someone else or a today's noob. So I will stick with that in future. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:17, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

So basically what you guys are saying is that you don't believe in the Worms? I dam you both to hell! Or other similar place of nastiness :P MrN 13:21, Oct 22

I take pills for them so I'm fine. Pup t 04:54, 23/10/2009

Uploaded one of your pictures

(I edited out my silent plea for help) I took your advice without knowing it and uploaded your picture on People Who Like to Fuck Naked. First time it's been used, so its like a newborn baby (you be the mother). K sera sera. Aleister in Chains 13:46, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Which is picture is that ? (puzzled). If you want to upload or use pictures - go to any article and hit edit. You will see how it is done and what you need to type in. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:52, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

Ok I see it. Forgot all about that weird photo. Not sure about the article though.It is a bit too obvious for me. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:42, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

30 October

Your recent comments in the Forum are valuable. Hajime isn't worth saving even after my tourniquet? So be it. Spıke ¬  21:44 30-Oct-09

Around the neck only...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:51, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

have you ever been told that..

..you're totally awesome! • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 17:49, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

As I am not sure if you are being ironic and I have no idea what this comment is a reference to , I will say thank you and leave it at that. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:12, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

No, really, I'm serious.. it's in reference to your general awesomeness everywhere at uncyc, especially at VFH. I salute you. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 18:59, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

OK Mahm00shA...but I am not a general so a salute is not necessary. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

no, you aren't.. you're leftenant RomArtus :)• FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 12:48, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Lieutenant is the English spelling but I understand the confusion. . American English say 'loo-ten-ant' and in British English say something like 'left-ten-ant'. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:53, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

There was no confusion, I already knew that. Also, is your work related Roman history? Your articles about Roman emperors are "awesome!" I'm a bit into ancient history, myself • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 13:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't my intention to get involved in that section but I had admired what Zarbag had stated and wanted to add and extend the sequence. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:56, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

You still haven't answered my question • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 14:02, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry...no I don;t work in that field at all. I am journalist and have a history degree but I work mainly in the showbiz end . So writing fictional or semi-fictional articles is an entertaining diversion for me.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 14:10, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

You're fucking awesome! (And I mean that in a partially non-gay way.) Pup

Attn: Regarding an article hosted on your website

Dear Mr/Ms Romartus/Archive2, Greetings. I am the lawyer for Arthur C. Clarke's estate. It has come to my assistant's attention that you recently supported an article on this website (henceforth referred to as "Uncyclopedia"), namely the article titled 2001: A Space Odyssey, to be featured on the website front page. We are honoured, although, of course: 1. We are fully aware of just how monumentally great the film is, and 2. We are preparing a suit against you for supporting copyright infringement, and the author of the article (referred to as "MacMania") is currently under arrest at Sri Lanka (not Ceylon).* However, we would be obliged if you would be able to do us one small favour. As interim representatives of Clarke's estate, we are in talks with Random House to commission a fifth book to add to the 2001 trilogy of four books. We've always been of the opinion that 3001: The Final Odyssey was too bleak of a book, and we would love to have the series finish on a slightly more upbeat note. We were thinking 3010: And Another Odyssey, by J K Rowling? Please let us know. Your obedient servant (in a figurative sense) James Steel c/o Alesha Phillips London EC4M 7EH UK * Why Ceylon got the works is nobody's business but the Sinhalese.

It's a bit late, but not as late as a late parrot. Thanks! Sir MacMania GUN—[13:56 3 Nov 2009]

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:33, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

---

Randumbo School of Writing

I posted this under your vote on VFD for Red Hot Chili Peppers, but wanted to put it here so you'd see it and it wouldn't get huffed right away like the article probably will. I like "Randumbo," and "Randumbo School of Writing" sounds like the name of an article, possibly a good one. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:22, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

I think there are enough examples of randumbo already on the website ! I don't think I coined the original term - I am sure someone else did write randumb in the VFD area but I think I expanded it , give it ears the size of wings and now use the term Randumbo...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:15, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

 Voting For Godot  

The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"   Thanks, <insert name here>, for ruining the pathos of my plight by voting for my featured article.

Street Fighter

Hey boss. I read what you said on the above article's vote page and I have a slight objection. I do not want my work to be featured unless it actually gets featured on it's merit. I will vote whore in as much as I want people to read it and comment and vote for or against, but I will never suggest to anybody that they vote in any manner other than what they believe is the right vote for an article. And as for an article being steamrollered to FA - there was an article recently that I read and felt that it didn't have the right stuff to be a feature. I voted against, with a fairly detailed reasoning as to why, even though the vote count at that stage was 8 to 0. After I had voiced my issues with it a number of others voted the same way, and what looked by early signs to becoming an FA was eventually rejected, and the author has been given detailed reasoning as to why. Having said all that, if you want to leave it as abstain, that's your call, but I don't quite get what you meant by self-indulgent. Pup

Also I fixed the code on the VFH. Somehow, the number 0 got deleted from the against count, which drove the template crazy. Those templates aren't much for brains. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:39, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

I noticed the fix. Thanks for that. I should look at making a few of these templates a little more robust really. Pup

Regards the Street Fighter article , it is one of those jokes that is like a self enclosed universe. E.G. Unless you have played the game - you are going to nearly miss all the jokes and as I read it , I realised I had no idea where the actual joke(s)/humour line was in the story. This seems to be ok as an article but to be a VFH , it has to project out for me at least to other casual readers who don't know this game . That was why I put the 'self indulgent' comment in. So I guess in the end I settled for a fatalistic abstain thinking this would march straight through to a nomination. Thanks anyway writing to me and asking about my vote . I always welcome feedback ! --RomArtus (talk). 13:49, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

New

--RomArtus (talk). 13:52, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:31, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

---

Thanks

 There is a featured article beyond all featured articles known to man...  

At the sign-post up ahead... You have just crossed over into... the Thank You Zone. The Global Tourniquet says "Thanks for voting for my featured article"

Alec Baldwin

Okay, Christopher Lee removed. what else you want? --Matfen 11:44, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Hi Matfen. That was only a suggestion. I haven't re-read it yet. Also I am not expecting that just because I don't think that Christopher Lee/clone angle worked , you would then take it out. The criticism I voice and others is to encourage the writer to look again at the piece and see if works or not. The Christopher Lee/clone story could work if you could have integrated into the main Baldwin article so it would make sense . So you could also say to me 'I disagree' and leave it in and see if other people like it or not. Saying all this , my own point was I liked it (As I did your Christian Bale article) and that I was only suggesting possible improvements - which you could consider, modify or reject...I will re-read it later and let you know on the page. --RomArtus (talk). 12:02, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

It's fine. To be honest, i was kind of unhappy with that section, laughwise, anyway. I'm just really paranoid about any negative votes after Christian Bale failed after 3 days, with only around 4-5 people having a chance to vote on it.--Matfen 12:09, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Well the voting on VFH can be weird. I have been here for nearly a year and I have yet to submit (or be submitted by someone else ) an article for VFH. I am quite glad of that as I am always going back to stuff I have written and then changing it. My main project is the one on the Roman emperors with User:Zarbag. So in other words Matfen - don't despair yet ! --RomArtus (talk). 12:49, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

sig

Hey. Do you mind popping your sig into a template and changing your preferences to have your sig link up to your template? ({{subst:User:Romartus/sig}}) Makes a neater code is all. Pup

I don't know how to do that. --RomArtus (talk). 15:12, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Just copy and paste your signature's code into a subpage (usually User:Romartus/sig), then put {{subst:User:Romartus/sig}} into the "signature" text field in Special:Preferences. Then click the check box for "custom signature." Then all you have to type is ~~~~ to sign your posts. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 22:03, Nov 11 2009

Important detail: You need to use {{subst:nosubst|User:Romartus/sig}}. Have a nice day, everyone. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:09, 11 November 2009

Best of all, everything you sign from now on will pick up any future changes you make to User:Romartus/sig. Spıke ¬  23:14 11-Nov-09

confused

Hi Romartus, I'm just curious about your vote. You said it was more like an UnBook. Is that the main reason you voted against, or were their other fatal errors? I want to make my article the best it can be, so I'd love to hear any advice you have. Thanks! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:15, Nov

It was more like My First Day Fishing than How to Fish and I thought the actual article needed a bit more editing as it seemed a bit loose to me. If it was an UnBook - the style would be ok. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:04, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Inclined to agree to be honest. It is more narrative than instructional, and is is also somewhat laissez faire. (Although I haven't read it since PLS to be fair, so it may have changed.) I'll vote on this tomorrow as well once I've re-read the article. (Still don't like the lumberjacks.) Pup

So, er, hypothetically, if this were changed to an UnBook, you would, er, hypothetically of course, change your vote? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 14:54, Nov

I would. I'd remove the weak bit. Also, I told you from the very begining, it's an unbook not a howto. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 14:59, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

It's changed. So thar. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 15:11, Nov 12 2009

OK I'll have another look but I was concerned it seemed a bit loose and not defined enough for a VFH. In an article it is how you are good at editing that is important. Some jokes/ideas don't work after second or third reading. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:24, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I know what you mean. But thanks anyway. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 19:36, Nov 12 2009

Carnies

I understand where you're coming from, but you should leave comments like that on either my talkpage or on the article's Pee Review page, where I'm much more likely to actually see it--if I didn't check my watchlist just now, I'd have likely never known about your comment, because the talkpage for DU has been inactive for quite a while. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:05, November 18, 2009 (UTC)