User talk:115ash

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Irrelevant Links and Cites Hi ash! Thanks for the welcome. I noticed many <ref> tags and links pointing to irrelevant content on many pages. Also there are { cites } which should ideally be in the ==External Links== sections, if at all. Can you please tell me how to mark them for review by admins/more experienced editors? TechXcell (talk) 05:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Hello @TechXcell! Sorry for not having responded earlier. Nevertheless, you can edit or delete the unrelated contents and links on your own. It isn't really required to mark them for review by reviewers or skilled contributors. If you have any difficulty, let me know or you might ask help here. I also suggest you to create your own userpage. --115ash→(☏) 08:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC) San Simonino di Trento Salve! Dalla tua cronologia si vede che parli l'italiano e sei capace in molti temi storici. Ti va di dare un'occiata a questa pagina: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussione:Simonino_di_Trento#Discussione_sulle_modifiche Purtroppo ci sono due utenti ovviamente e molto anticlericali (un ebreo...e l'altro non lo so) che mi costringono a far qualsiasi modifica, dicendo che non e' consenso. Vabbe'...se vedi bene la storia/cronologia hanno fatto lo stesso gioco con gli altri utenti. Che ne pensi? Thanks for the welcome Used Wikipedia for years, but never contributed before. Finding my way round the protocols - thanks for your welcome and I hope to contribute more in the future.Bedford67 (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Thanks and I need help. Hi, I'm not used to this, and so I appreciate any help you could give me. An editor indicated that my new citations on the Andrew R. Heinze page were messed up. I'm not sure what is wrong with them, but it's probably something for sure. Maybe I should have answered the person who flagged them, but I don't know if that's the way I should do it (and I don't know how to do that anyway). I DID read all about how to do all this stuff, but it seems so mysterious, I couldn't for the life of me figure it out. Thanks so much.EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Hello @EastDimeBoxFrank. Most of your references were independent sources. Please read --> WP:RELY. I recommend you to create a new section to Talk:Andrew R. Heinze, so the problems may be resolved. --115ash→(☏) 14:57, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Hi (I couldn't figure out how to put your name in here), Thanks for your comment. I just did as you suggested and created a new section on the Andrew R Heinze talk page. As I said on that new talk section, I feel bad about messing up the Andrew R Heinze Wiki article because it didn't have flags on it before I added the new citations. An article with flags on it looks bad. (I guess it's true, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it.") In any event, now I want to make it good. So... can I take my mistakes one by one (on that talk page) and correct each one? You said that most of my references were independent sources... that's good, right? EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Right now I am improving a bunch of the sources on Andrew R. Heinze... including sources that came from other people. They were probably good once, but when I looked, they were dead. EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Improvement of Andrew R. Heinze article sources. Dear 115ash, Could we move our conversation about improving the Andrew R. Heinze sources to the article talkpage? That way I won't miss anything. I just found out that would be a helpful thing for me to do. EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 23:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC) I just wanted to say a quick hello and to tell you that I'm moving ahead and learning a lot from some wonderful Wiki editors. DimeBoxFrank (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC) If you have any problem, don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! --115ash→(☏) 13:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC) Need advice about uploaded photo Hello, 115ash, I need help in getting a photo I have already uploaded into Wikipedia Commons to show up on a Wikipedia page. The page is for Leif Erland Andersson, planetary astronomer. It may be only because I have not yet been registered for ten days. Thanks, Antynome112233 (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC) Hi @Antynome112233, as Ip 62.107.222.74 said, you forgot ".jpg" and "File". However, it wasn't enough. That article contains a lot of mistakes, and it must include the infobox. --115ash→(☏) 09:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Hi 115ash Thanks for the welcome !- I set up a complete new page about the story of a church ( all facts) and have been deleted for advertising, I have enquired of the person that deleted the page so I can review and correct, bit harsh as this is my very first go at Wiki and I cant see how the history of Church is advertising ! but perhaps this is the process to go through to learn how it all works but thanks to you for the welcome! Basilcat1 (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Leonardo da Vinci Yeah, that works. I have. Been away for a couple of months, in the process of organising a remove to the other side of the planet. My library is at present somewhere on the high seas. I approach Wikipedia with a sense of trepidation after an absence. Leonardo da Vinci is a particular target. It is always good to return and find articles not simply intact but genuinely improved. Amandajm (talk) 02:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC) fAKpEDİA))))))) HEY I want you to became an administrator join a new community of smart =) http://fakpedia.ucoz.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael Makzon (talk • contribs) 09:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks for Welcoming me Hi Ash Thanks for Welcoming me and also giving me some tips. :) Hope I learn more from you. :) --talibong (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Need Help Hi Ash Can you help me regarding the article that I created. It says it requires notability. Can you explain and help me to make it more informative and pass general guidelines. Thank You. --talibong (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Hi @talibong. I just edited that article, which seems to be written as an advertisement. Someone can even nominate it for deletion. Try to find and add some reliable sources. --115ash→(☏) Hi Ash Thanks for the help. I will rewrite this one. Regards --talibong (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Hi Ash I have updated the ikoala page by adding more infos and business model. Can you have a look on it. Thanks Regards --talibong (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48 Here User:RightCowLeftCoast asked me for assistance regarding what he described as "a potentially disruptive editor", speaking of your edits which are the topic of this talk page section. I have not looked at the edits themselves, but I do see (UTC times) 15:25, October 20, 2014‎: last of a series of five unexplained edits to the article by you 06:12, October 23, 2014: a revert by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold edits per WP:BRD; no consensus to radically alter lead or infobox, lead and infobox represent all significant/largest population Asian American populations; edits had given undue weight to South Asian Americans" 08:36, October 23, 2014‎: last of a series of three edits by you with individual explanatory summaries 19:25, October 24, 2014‎ reversion by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold change, no consensus on talk page, see consensus built here Talk:Asian American/Archive 7#Infobox ethnicity representatives) 19:31, October 24, 2014: creation of a talk page section by RightCowLeftCoast, at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes with initial content explaining his objections to your edits and asking that you discusss the matter there and not begin an edit war 19:33, October 24, 2014: an invitation here (above) by RightCowLeftCoast for you to join a discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes 11:26, November 3, 2014: last of a series of three edits by you (two explained, one not) 00:08, November 4, 2014‎: revertion by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold change, no consensus on talk page, see consensus built here Talk:Asian American/Archive 7#Infobox ethnicity representatives" 00:21, November 4, 2014: Request for assistance on my talk page RightCowLeftCoast I have fumbled around a bit putting that timeline together, but I think I have it right. Please discuss this at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes to build a consensus for your desired changes. Please note, without accusing anyone of amything, I ask that both editors involved here review Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#Characteristics of problem editors. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Bingo! Nice summary and one worth gazing in a figurative "objectivity" mirror! At any given time we can all plunge fromr objectivity, a fact based world, into passion or special pleading. It is to be feared! Palmeira (talk) 04:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Thanks and Question Hi there! I created a page for architect/scholar A. Lawrence Kocher and it's now pending review. Is there any way I could get someone to check it out while I'm waiting, so I can continue to improve and edit the page? Thanks so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Hi @Lufiona14. That article is good enough and it has been created. Now you can start to ameliorate it. 115ash→(☏) 11:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Awesome!! Thanks! --Lufiona14 (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Hi 115ash, I just created another page for a firm called STUDIO V Architecture. I have the same question - any way I could get feedback while I'm waiting in queue so I can continue to improve and edit my page? Thanks so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC) Hello @Lufiona14. That article is better than the previous one, it contains several reliable sources. I think you could create it directly. However, something need to be improved. As regards this "Jay Valgora", it had to be created separately. I don't know why you have submitted it alongside "STUDIO V Architecture". 115ash→(☏) 15:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Hi 115ash -- Hm I actually only intended to create STUDIO V Architecture (Not the Jay Valgora) at this time, so posting only STUDIO V would be great. Could you tell me how to create it directly? I asked the wiki chatroom a few days ago but couldn't figure it out. Thanks again, so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC) Just click here, and then you'll understand.115ash→(☏) 12:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC) article/biography Not Looking the way it's suppose to Hi so as I'm working on this article/biography of a popstar when I preview it, it doesn't look the it's suppose to please help!!!--Byron Carmello Inc (talk) 11:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Hi @Byron Carmello Inc That article should be improved. Click here 115ash→(☏) 14:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC) My topic has still errors Hi Ash I have updated my topic Ikoala but still got errors. Can you help me to fix that Regards --talibong (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC) 1st Wisconsin Legislature I'm slogging my way through, one at a time. Just discovered that one of them lit out for the California gold fields in '49 and became a well-known pioneer (and legislator) out there. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Talkback Hello, 115ash. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom (Beast Quest). Message added 13:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. NorthAmerica1000 13:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC) Help how to make my userpage like you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey786 (talk • contribs) Hi @Mickey786. You could have a user page like my one by considering the source code of my user page, and setting it into your your. Howsoever, remember to sign you messages. 115ash→(☏) 14:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC) Hi @115ash. , I just make a newspaper article of wikipedia but now i get notifictions speddy deletion , why? this is real place and bussines you can confirm by visiting her office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey786 (talk • contribs) You need to add more reliable sources on that article. DO NOT forget to sign! 115ash→(☏) 15:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC) Meghdad Goharnia Dear friend The page - Meghdad - where it is redirected to Meghdad Goharnia is a mistake is he is someone else and full name of my this person is Meghdad Mostafaei. Could you please change to Meghdad Mostafaei since I have more data from him to update the page .. Thank You! Maxmostaf (talk) 01:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)maxmostaf 1:07, 25 November 2014 Your displaytitle Hey, just a friendly note I changed the markup/styling of your display title in /Bar to keep it from boldening the entire page. Hope this is okay :) — MusikAnimal talk 05:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC) @MusikAnimal, thanks. --115ash→(☏) 09:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you! The Writer's Barnstar Dear 115ash, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Egorov Alexandre. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 15:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC) add Dutch wiki as source English wiki Hello The article on Karl Hammer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hammer is an excerpt from a Dutch wiki article http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hammer_Kaatee But I can't figure out how to add this source to the English page. I noticed your contribution, so can you assist? thank you kindly Magister OFM (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Hi, @Magister OFM, I am a bit unclear about what you intend to say. Where are you having problems? --115ash→(☏) 10:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Don't worry about it. I already figured it out. Thanks --Magister OFM (talk) 08:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC) Muhammad bin abdullah In this entry it is stated that the daily prayer is not mentioned in the Quran bit in fact Allah the Most High mentions salaat several times and refers to when they are too be offered. The specifics of how to pay were furnished in the sunnah. Surah 4:103 is just one example from the Quran. 2607:FB90:337:B0B6:1E74:9836:CFCA:2668 (talk) 04:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Abdul Wadud Edit of Aint them bodies saints Hi 115ash! I agree with your edit, I was just putting down all the information before I made it more concise, it is far too long! if you want to make it more concise please do implement the changes yourself too! Hope this collaborative effort makes great page! FilmLover91 talk) 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Sorry to be so blunt towards the previous user who removed my post Hi 115 Ash, Sorry to be so blunt towards the previous user who removed my post. But I am very proud about what I said, and I would love for the Internet users of the world to be aware of the physical obstacles that arise for beginners. Sorry if this seems a bit much, but I am quite hurt and mystified as to why I was not allowed to post an insightful comment. Thank you x Twerkobama (talk 14:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC) I am welcoming you to make useful edits --115ash→(☏) 15:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)- Rewriting History Sir, I am a war veteran cavalry officer, wounded and decorated for valour in war of which I have fought two, and have been actively involved in counter insurgency operations. I left service due to injuries sustained both during war and peace. I commanded an Armoured Regiment and resigned my commission. Part of the reason was the blatant way history was twisted with lies and half truths. List of true and unsung heroes is long. I want your views if, with the available new information from the media and now declassified information, it is time to rewrite History true to as it actually happened. You have recently removed small but very relevant changes I made on the Longowala operations and 1961 Goa Operations. regards Colonel Jai Jind (talk 15:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC) @Colonel Jai Jind, on an encyclopedia like Wikipedia you should not include those things. The anti-vandalism tool has identified all of them as vandalism. Nevertheless. I am welcoming you to make worthwhile edits --115ash→(☏) 16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Damian Wayne powers and abilities Hello 115ash, Perhaps it could be better formatted to reference the comic book, but it seems appropriate to mention his newly acquired super powers under the 'powers and abilities' section. The incident of Damian fighting Kalibak with his superstrength is referenced in the plot summary in the wikipedia page. The current write of the Batman and Robin comic book talks about Damian's new super powers in this article http://www.newsarama.com/23035-batman-robin-writer-why-he-s-back-why-with-superpowers-and-what-s-next.html The powers will be around for at least the next few months, so I think it's worthwhile to mention them in the article. 62.31.215.203 (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC) You could add that reference.--115ash→(☏) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 1962 Sino-Indian War truth and circumstantial vidence Sir, 1962 Sino Indian war was a national disaster for India, for which Both Political and Military leaders were directly responsible. In order to cover up, they looked for Scalps from the junior leadership. The units fought under extreme hardship, specially the Tank unit that scaled the hazardous heights at great personal courage, without adequate administrative cover and Infantry support. Their rearguard action was not recognized. This needs correction, and also citations for those who laid their lives by keeping the enemy at bay and not allowing it to cut the roads at Bomdila, Chaka and Dirang Dzong. In Sino Indian war, tanks were employed under worst conditions than the epic battles of Zojila in J&K operations of 1948. In reference the book titled 'WE LEAD' by CL proudfoot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonel Jai Jind (talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Redirects I am redirecting those articles due to notability concerns. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Article: Ebadur Rahman Hi, Thanks for creating the article. I made some small edits in the article 'Mohammed Ebadur Rahman'. First of all, Mohammed is not part of his name. If you check all the cited references, nowhere he is addressed as 'Mohammed'. Secondly he writes in Bengali and English, and currently does not hold the French nationality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khkalachand (talk • contribs) 09:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 14 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seven Heartz Gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MLG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) A barnstar for you! The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar "The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar is awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked." Thanks for your appreciation and kind gesture. Faizan 19:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Multiple patterning I meant to revise the comment after, with some citation. It would be more appropriate in the NAND section. Yet it is the most aggressive use of multiple patterning, with the highest wafers per day still.219.85.224.184 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Talkback Hello, 115ash. You have new messages at OccultZone's talk page. Message added 15:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Create album I do not bother with single width presses Rykvrdz Island is one of the leading users have written yourself.--5.232.49.178 (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC) The article has been nominated for deletion. --115ash→(☏) 09:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Create album This article is licensed under your Gngv As mentioned Arntsharat Island Rykvrdz this album .mshhvrtryn album, which is sold in all countries--5.232.49.178 (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Even if you remove the template, it doesn't matter. It may be deleted after few days. --115ash→(☏) 09:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Apologies Look at the diff wrong :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Mail Hello, 115ash. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Tkuvho (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC) Hi dear administrator. I need your help. Few users named Jonathan Barrett and Alessandro57 are trying to spoil Luca Pacioli's article. One is of Italian ancestry and the other is probably a Spanish. Can you do something so that none can remove my faithful edits? Your help will be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buswkycaveshottest (talk • contribs) 09:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Ebadur Rahman and Egorov Alexandre Hello, 115ash. Today I was checking over an old page in draft space, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ebadur Rahman, and I realized that it had a lot of the same text that you added to the article Ebadur Rahman when you first created it. It appears that you copied some of the sentences from the draft when you made the article. Then while getting ready to leave this message, I noticed that you had created Egorov Alexandre, which was also copied from a previous draft. This was last year, so likely since then you have figured out that you should move the existing draft to the new title and then make changes to it, rather than making a new page, so that others can see who originally wrote the text. I have merged both pairs of pages together (which you can see if you look at the histories), so all is well. (Confession: I did the same thing when I first joined Wikipedia.) Are there any others that should be repaired? —Anne Delong (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Ooops, I should have mentioned that there are some situations where a move won't work, and copying is necessary, such as when two articles are being merged into one, or when the same text is to be in two articles. Here's a link that explains what to do in those cases: WP:Copying within Wikipedia. —Anne Delong (talk) 12:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 5 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beccaria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC) Emilio Gino Segrè He is much more commonly known as Emilio Segrè, the policy is that articles should be given the name the subject is best known for, while the lede should show full names and nicknames, etc. I will revert shortly.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC) The former one included "G.". This time only "Emilio Segrè" could be acceptable.--115ash→(☏) 16:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Re:Hmmm Why? I said the sin, but not the sinner. Moreover, the edit history of the article is so messy, that one would need to be Sherlock Holmes to understand who was the author...Anyway, it wasn't my intention to offend you, I wanted just to explain the problem with one example, sorry. Alex2006 (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Allora traduco il proverbio : "Si dice il peccato, ma non il peccatore" And so did I. :-) Anyway, I praised you this morning on the same thread, so 1-1. :-) Alex2006 (talk) 14:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC) In English we can translate it as "Hate the sin, love the sinner", but you have to understand it "in senso lato" (none is sinning here at wikipedia :-)). The hearth with the French colours represents our solidarity with our "sorella latina", who was hit by the killings two weeks ago. Hopefully we will never see a red-white-green hearth here... Alex2006 (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Why? Because of Napoleon? Or the theft of the Gioconda :-)? Or maybe Euro 2000? Anyway, the mailbox is empty... Alex2006 (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Reference errors on 4 December Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the Winston Churchill page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC) January 2016: blocked You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for outing. Ash, a user discovered purely by accident that you had posted their real name, and connected it with their Wikipedia account, on Wikipedia. Your edit has been oversighted to protect the user's privacy. At first I thought you possibly didn't realize what a bad idea that was and were merely being thoughtless. But now I've looked at the situation, and it's obvious you were angry with the user at that time. That makes it difficult for me to interpret your edit as a good-faith mistake. (I can explain the details in e-mail, if what I say should be obscure to you — though I'm pretty sure you understand me — I don't want to say more here, because I don't want to identify the other user.) Breaches of privacy are a very serious form of harassment. If you wish to appeal this block, you should read the policy on Outing and show that you have understood it, besides the usual (= reading the guide to appealing blocks). Also, be careful not to commit further breaches of privacy in any unblock request on this page. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 18:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 115ash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I just wanted to make him little bit notable, (I wasn't angry with him at all) as he already included many of the information of his private life. Anyway, I apologize and won't do it anymore. Being blocked permanently seems injustice, by the same admin. Regards. 115ash→(☏) 10:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Decline reason: "Make him a little bit notable" is a pretty silly explanation, especially looking at the context. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. To the reviewing admin: this had better be done by e-mail, I suppose, so that everyone can speak frankly. Could you please make your presence known here, and then 115ash and I can both give you any details we want by e-mail? Bishonen | talk 15:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC). One thing to Ash, though: you haven't been blocked "permanently". The indefinitely is a link, please click on it to see that "indefinite" doesn't mean "infinite". Bishonen | talk 15:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC). Ash: I guess Ohnoitsjamie has declined your requests on its merits, just from what he could see. I can't say I blame him. If you want to appeal again, please do it via the page WP:UTRS. Tell them I suggested it. To them, you can write any details you want (for instance, you can give evidence for your statement that "he already included many of the information of his private life"), and you don't need to worry about discretion. Bishonen | talk 15:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC). This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 115ash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I apologised. Bish, What could I do? I'm using wiki for very long. Help me, thanks. 115ash→(☏) 11:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC) Decline reason: I'm declining this as a technicality, as with the evidence not visible any more it is really pretty much impossible to do a review here. Please follow Bishonen's direction to use WP:UTRS to appeal, where you will be able to discuss what happened openly in a more confidential forum. And do tell them it was Bishonen's suggestion and that they can contact her for her view of it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Bishonen, I've sent an email. Thanks.--115ash→(☏) 11:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Through WP:UTRS, I hope? If you've sent it to me, I'm afraid I haven't received it. Bishonen | talk 12:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC). To both.--115ash→(☏) 16:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC) I suggest you try again, then. I still haven't received it. Bishonen | talk 21:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC). Bish, did you receive it?--115ash→(☏) 15:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC) No, afraid not. I don't know what the problem is, as I seem to be getting messages from other wikipedians without any trouble. I know your message to WP:UTRS worked, though, because they've asked me a couple of questions about it. Have they responded to you yet? Bishonen | talk 15:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC). It was an admin to told me that I won't be unblocked--115ash→(☏) 15:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC). Hi Bishonen. What should I do? I am blocked since 5th.--115ash→(☏) 14:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC) An UTRS admin? Well, perhaps your unblock request to them wasn't very convincing. Also, the situation, the timing of the outing, makes it look very dodgy, IMO. You could always try to appeal the UTRS decline again, by writing either directly to the admin who contacted you, or via the WP:UTRS page again. If you do, do think about what you say, and consider the reason you were blocked and what the declining admin says about the reason for the decline. It's out of my hands. Another thing you can do is appeal in six months' time, per the Standard offer. (That's only an essay, but it's quite widely accepted.) Note that the standard offer can only work if you haven't socked in the meantime. If you should edit from an IP or alternative account while you're blocked, you will be cooked for good on English Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 14:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC). Bish, your last sentences appear little bit rude. Anyways, I am using Wikipedia for almost two years. Within a year I've been a rollbacker and a pcr (as everyone knows these do not make me superior, but still do you understand what I mean). I am blocked as I'd be user Bambifan101 or a notable vandal. I can't remain blocked like this. Thanks.--115ash→(☏) 14:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Sorry that sounded rude. Truthfully, I was afraid it might, and hesitated to say it — but I thought it important to warn you about editing from an IP to avoid scrutiny, since you've done it before.[1][2] I was afraid you might not realise the seriousness of doing it in this situation, assuming that you want to take advantage of the standard offer. Bishonen | talk 15:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC). Racism in Italy Salve, Compa'! Purtroppo c'e' un problema sulla voce Racism_in_Italy in cui ce ne sono 3 editori ebrei che NON SANNO NULLA del tema (e manco capiscono la lingua!), e poi hanno dirotatto la pagina. Ad esempio, sapiamo benissimo che Lombroso era ebreo, ed io l'ho inserito varie volte perch'e' rilevante (contribuì vari pezzi a molti giornali ebrei, scrisse un libro intero su "antisemitismo" e quasi tutti gli storici ed accademici si referiscono a lui come "italo-ebreo", "ebreo-italiano" ecc). Ti chiedo un favorone: aiutami a partecipare e correggere quella pagina. Il tema di "razzismo" in Italia e' grosso ed importante perche' ancora esiste. Ma per me e' anche importante parlarsene con fatti e tutta l'informazione oggettiva possibile. Grazie, e buon anno!!!!Trinacrialucente (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Collin Haughton for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collin Haughton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collin Haughton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 21:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC) As you are currently blocked, I will move any comment you make here over to the AFD page, should you request. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 21:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC) This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System: 115ash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #15845 was submitted on May 27, 2016 10:35:58. This review is now closed. --UTRSBot (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, 115ash. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)