Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom (Beast Quest)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (Soft delete, minding low participation.) czar ⨹ 20:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tom (Beast Quest)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and it isn't encyclopedic. 115ash^→(☏) 11:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If this is an article about a real person, then this can be deleted as Unreferenced. But... This looks like an article about a fictional person, so that means that WP:BLP does not apply. Since this article is unreferenced, we can't confirm who or what this article talks about, or wether or not it is about a real person or not, or even if it is entirely made up by the page creator. DSCrowned^(talk) 12:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The article is about a fictional character in the Beast Quest novels series. As such, WP:BLP is not applicable. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

N.b. the original nomination stated "WP:BLP absolutely fails." (diff). NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (jaw) @ 15:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.