Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sagnik Goswami (talk | contribs) at 17:18, 27 January 2014 (Sandip Goswami: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY

To Whom It May Concern: The article should be undeleted because the user/admin. who deleted it, did so wrongfully! The article is not advertisement nor is it promoting any products, companies, etc. The article merely states how the technologies work, function and what they do. I am new to the wiki community and did not know, that the save button meant that the article was going to go live. I had not added any References yet! I had worked for three hours on the text -not counting the days of research- and did not save a copy of it either, I wanted to save it should something happen with my connection, etc. I was planning on adding pictures, links, references before submitting it. I have written permission from Heinz-Gustav Reisser and NIAMA-REISSER, LLC to edit and create this Technology Page!

Here the references:

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2011/06/25/long-road-ahead.html http://www.dieselpowermag.com/news/1010dp_niama_reisser_a_new_car_company_is_born/ http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/1203dp_eight_companies_determained_to_change_diesel_engines_forever/photo_03.html http://2011-salon-auto-ch.www5.iomedia.infomaniak.ch/en/premieres/niama-reisser-llc-nr-1-0-22915 http://infotruck.blogspot.com/2012/02/trucks-r-d-usa.html http://www.motor-journal.com/2012/04/27/otto-diesel-wankel-reisser/heinz-stefan-und-heinz-gustav-reisser-kl/ http://www.idac.co.uk/enews/articles/200-mpg%20Car.pdf http://ansys.com/Hall+of+Fame/Archive/ch.2011.leaseHighlights http://fhotd64476.yuku.com/topic/61073#.UtluzRAo6M8 http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?p=1075 http://patents.justia.com/inventor/heinz-gustav-a-reisser http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/niama-reisser-llc-launches-a-crowd-funding-project-for-their-21-century-carbon-fiber-furniture-bathroom-fixtures-accessories-exclusive-meets-affordable-314629.htm http://www.google.com/patents/US7415962 https://www.facebook.com/pages/NiamaReisserLLC/155443127799466 http://www.youtube.com/user/NiamaReisserLLC http://www.reisser.com/ http://www.niamareisser.com/

I am looking forward to getting this article undeleted. Please be so kind as to add the above listed links, so that the references are there. Once it is undeleted, I will add the necessary pictures that I have.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreim (talkcontribs) 18:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 It's irrelevent the number of sources you provide and whether or not you have written permission from them. We do not tolerate pages that serve the primary purpose of promoting their subject, and so G11 deletions (promotional/advert) are not undeleted as they would require a fundamental rewrite to be encyclopedia articles. We also do not accept the subject themselves, press releases for same, user-generated content sources, or context-free listings as sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have put this at Draft:Niama-Reisser Technology so that you can fix it up. We can do without sentences with surprise marks ! on them, as the idea is not to be amazing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there: How do I move the article from Draft to mainstream? I made the proposed/necessary changes. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreim (talkcontribs) 01:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noa Sheidlower

I need the page back so I can use what was written in it for reference -Maezi (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - I will not restore this, because there is no chance that it could be a Wikipedia article - stories of family and friends are not the sort of thing an encyclopedia is for. However, I will email you the text if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Live Nation Middle East

reasoning - to make the necessary edits requested.80.227.120.238 (talk) 05:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. What is needed is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bambakomallophobia

From what I read from the Proposed Deletion log, it was deleted because the phenomenon was thought to be a hoax. It most certainly is not. Bambakomallophobia and other textile/texture related anxiety disorders (Bambakophobia, Eliophobia, etc.) are not hoaxes and in fact, many of the textile/texture related anxiety disorders are connected to one another. People actually SUFFER from this phobia, and the fact that Wikipedia deleted it adds to the stigma of the condition. From what I was able to read in the log, the article was actually quite accurate. Very little research has been done on sufferers of Bambakomallophobics and other related conditions, because of the stigma of hoax, but it may actually be a genetic phenomenon, unlike other specific phobias. Because of this, bambakomallophbia might not respond well to traditional treatments of specific phobia and anxiety disorders. I beg that this page be reinstatedGstridsigne (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC) -Gstridsigne (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It currently has no sources, however, and so is still a candidate for deletion - please add citations to reliable sources in order to prevent re-deletion. Yunshui  09:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I wasn't sure what was stated in the article, so I will do my best to clean it up to Wikipedia standards. Gstridsigne (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPAMfighter

updated, improved quality and added references -193.9.159.226 (talk) 09:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: the deleted article has been re-created, and deletion is once again under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPAMfighter (2nd nomination). That is where you should comment, but please read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KIMONO JACK

I, Dr.Kimono, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Now verifiable from outside published source - Dr.Kimono (talk) 12:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H V Kumar

H V Kumar is a highway legend in India. The page is dedicated to him and provides information about him to all other travelers on Indian highways and roads. The page lists his important achievements as well as links to his contact information. He provides invaluable service to lots of Indians who travel on highways and roads. Hence it is requested that this page be undeleted and restored in its earlier form. -49.187.169.96 (talk) 12:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. V. Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H._V._Kumar

I, 49.187.169.96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 49.187.169.96 (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - see entry above. JohnCD (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sons of Liberty Spirits Company

Bricard (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit is as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references (a) to verify what the article says, and (b) to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Structure101

95.44.240.71 (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prince Albert Multicultural Council

I, 71.17.57.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 71.17.57.218 (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Albert Multicultural Council

i want to edit it and try to resubmit an article for our organizations profile in wikipedia -71.17.57.218 (talk) 16:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I have restored your Articles for Creation submission, see item above, for you to work on, but this directly-submitted article was a copy of the organization's website. Wikipedia cannot accept copyright material unless a formal copyright release is made; no doubt you could do that, but it is seldom worth doing because an organization's own website usually has an unsuitably promotional tone - an encyclopedia is not a place for organizations to "tell the world" about themselves. For advice, read:
JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MonsterMortgage.ca

I, Tdlieu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tdlieu (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Christianson

No idea why this page would have been deleted. This is a real person and a coach in the national football league. Should be available when clicking on the coaching staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.55.169 (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted so long ago. At these time he was a women's soccer coach for a high school. If he has become notable in the mean time you can write a new article without prejudice from the previous AFD. I will restore history if a new article is written that shows notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff

I, CamV8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. CamV8 (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H._V._Kumar

This is a request for undeletion of this page. Contrary to the perception around of H V Kumar not being a huge celebrity, he has a significant fan following and acceptance among the users of Indian highways. A simple Google search will return a lot of articles and mentions about him and his immense knowledge around Indian highways https://www.google.com/search?q=H+V+kumar. Given the complexity of the highways and roads in India and with so little information publicly available online, he performs a great service to his followers who reach out to him for help with directions and guidance while traveling. This page by listing his achievements but also his contacts allows a lot more highway users to start following him and be part of his group. Hence it is requested that this page be restored to its original form and whatever else is needed to maintain this page will be done by the group members. Thanks. -203.41.19.147 (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told twice that this page will not be undeleted here and to go to WP:Deletion review instead. Any further posting of requests about this will be removed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete article for creation (Snatch Magnet)

I, Wikiwikibawwah, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wikiwikibawwah (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Bollinger

Can you undelete prior revisions, now that the current version is substantially different from deleted version? -George Ho (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Truck Ads

I was contacted by Hasteurbot about the page getting ready to be deleted if I don't edit it. When I first created it, I thought I was following proper guidelines and it would get published. Obviously I was wrong and this time I would like to successfully publish the creation and could use help in doing it properly. So I want to try again. -Rodoharris (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. please provide references to get this approved and resubmit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monica May (stage_actress)

She is a famous actress and deserves noting even if some of the links in the page don't work... -72.229.251.230 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica May (stage actress), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Darkwind (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. TO address this find the newspapers and magazines that talked about her. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Little Alchemy

Little Alchemy is a game on the Internet, which can also download from the App Store. When you start a game, it contains a white board and a side bar, first with 4 elements(water, fire, earth and air). Then you can combine water and earth to become mud. Then combine mud air to become stone. Then it goes on. It has a total of 450 combinations of elements.

 Not done Well you have written more here than was in the article. If you have references you can go and create it yourself. The only thing in the deleted article was a blank gallery, so nothing worth restoring for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


http://littlealchemy.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huniguni (talkcontribs) 10:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Naomi K Isted

I, Blondietv, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Blondietv (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

reasoning -Blondietv (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui  12:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POLLUX project

  • {{revisions| contribs) deleted page POLLUX project (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)"

I strongly disagree in the deletion of the page and kindly ask you to restore the page as it was prior to the deletion. It is in no manner meant to be an advertising or promoting page. I am aware that a picture was removed from the article due to lack of copyright proof. Although I know that we're allowed to use the picture I accept the deletion of it, but not the deletion of the page it self.

I searched for the user Secret, and found the following information: "Retired from administrative tasks, got burned out and stopped enjoying contributing to Wikipedia, not to mention I'm going though some personal problems. ..."

I kindly ask you to reconsider the decision of user Secret, and republish the wiki article.

I'm looking forward hearing from you.

Dear, I created a wiki page called 'POLLUX project'. It was accepted by Wikipedia and published on November 22nd 2013. Then the page was surprisingly deleted by user Secret on December 15th 2013.

"05:18, 15 December 2013 Secret (talk -Lars1315 (talk) 12:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Almost all of the content had been lifted directly from http://www.artemis-pollux.eu/ and its subpages. Yunshui  12:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/SGH Martineau

Rebeccainnes (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nairobi Half Life

I, 91.61.80.220, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. We would like to rework the deleted draft and finally publish 91.61.80.220 (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - there is no point undeleting the AfC submission because the article has been published at Nairobi Half Life. You are welcome to make any improvements there. JohnCD (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Northover (design consultancy)

reasoning -Foggywells (talk) 17:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lloyd Northover (design consultancy) has not been accepted. It was deleted for reasons of copyright (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement). Much of the content was taken from an existing Wikipedia article created in 2011. All content on Wikipedia is freely copyable and reusable anywhere on the site - it is common to find paragraphs or sections used across multiple pages. Such cross-referencing is part of the point of Wikipedia. The existing article and the proposed one contain information generated by me and do not contain any copyrighted material. Lloyd Northover was a significant and influential international design consultancy of interest to the global academic and professional design communities. It deserves a place on Wikipedia. Foggywells Foggywells (talk) 17:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason why you can't expand the article John Lloyd (graphic designer) instead, which already includes information about this venture of John Lloyd? Generally we add material to the main article unless that subtopic would dominate the primary topic. At that point we can split it out. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
John Lloyd left the Lloyd Northover design consultancy in 2004. The proposed article covers developments beyond his involvement. It should, therefore, stand alone.

Foggywells Foggywells (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Goldar

The entire page was deleted as a result of a discussion where "redirect" was chosen as the closure, and the entire page history is missing. The administrator responsible has not edited in over a week, and frankly I don't know where else to make this request. I would just like to use the content in the page history to merge to its proper location. -—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already  Done by the closing admin. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oakdale Gun Club

I humbly ask for the renewal of my article. I am new to Wikipedia, and want another chance to get my article credentialed enough to be properly published on this public encyclopedia. I do not have the information saved anywhere else, but will do so in the future, knowing what I know now about how Wikipedia works. Please allow me this opportunity. Thank-you for your time. Bronzehour (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Southport 24 hour race

dispute "Unnotable" -212.219.220.116 (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please improve the article if you can. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTMStatueMpls.jpg

The Commons copy (File:MplsMTMstatue.jpg) is found ineligible for Commons. Therefore, the local copy must be undeleted and then tagged as unfree. Statues in the U.S. are copyrighted. -George Ho (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laubwerk

Hello, Laubwerk GmbH is a 3D Software Company based in Germany, Potsdam. We are constantly developing 3D Software and improve the system and release new Products. We have created this Wikipedia page to let the people know about the 3D progresses and Laubwerk's involvements in the 3D area and 3D print and web articles. Kindly please restore the Laubwerk Wikipedia page. Thank you. -Cristina.coconu (talk) 09:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheus Entertainment

wish_to_read_the_article -79.114.22.63 (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Canadian DJ Show

I, Tfelsky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tfelsky (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Workmen's Auto Insurance

This page gives information about this company that you can't find anywhere else, I interview the owners in order to get that content. Also, it shows/explains that is has nothing to do with the term Worker's Compensation and this differentiation can't be found anywhere else. The 1st owner was the creator of Kelly Blue Book and the actual owners are one of the pioneer families in Downtown LA. -Sangonca (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Jesus Experience

The article was deleted for being a non-notable release. The album in question had a music video released, has a review at Jesusfreakhideout.com and was re-released on iTunes by its publisher. It's also listed in another Wikipedia article Bride (band). Please consider its notability before deleting without argument. -Typenolies (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Stacy Sullivan

working on editing -Spirit2heart (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Koji Oishi

Are prior revisions substantially different from current version. If so, they must be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 21:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Paraisy

Are prior revisions similar to current version? If not, undeleted they must be. -George Ho (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conor McGregor

How many more previously deleted wrestler articles were re-created? Prior revisions should be different from current version. Otherwise, I apologize for consuming your time. -George Ho (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Dimitri Papadimos

had submitted the page several times and for some reason never received feed back and was only notified for deletion by User:HasteurBot on January 20th 2014. Would like to add that same page already exist in the Greek Wiki pages. This page is the English version. -5.54.70.203 (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 5.54.70.203 (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Yani papadimos (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter Raby

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lynda Radley

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessica Swale

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Taylor (theatre designer)

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter Rice (sound designer)

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emma Laxton

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sam Spencer-Lane

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Leigh

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nigel Lilley

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stef Smith

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter Raby

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Spurling

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alan Strachan

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Howard Hudson

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Morgan Large

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Imogen Knight

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joshua Carr

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Fortune (Composer)

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Jones (designer)

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Golledge

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca Howell

I, 88.104.27.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Amanda Steele

reasoning -Margootje123 (talk) 14:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done In addition to the reason given for deletion, the page was purely promotional. It was not at all suitable as a Wikipedia article. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Lee Fultz

PLEASE UNDELETE page on: Mona Lee Fultz

reasoning -MonaLee1 (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. This actress of more than 50 films and Juilliard grad has her complete filmography on IMDB and there are cross-references in other Wikipedia pages for films she's been in.

   IMDB PAGE:  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0496727/?ref_=nv_sr_1

WIKIPEDIA for The Legend of Billie Jean, film she is in and listed in credits at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legend_of_Billie_Jean

2. She has starred in movies by and been an acting coach for filmmaker Richard Linklater, creator of cult classic Dazed and Confused, among others, which she was in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazed_and_Confused_(film)#Cast

3. She's in Linklater's latest movie, Boyhood, that is releasing in March, 2014 This film is currently getting high marks at the prestigious Sundance Film Festival. See her name in credits for the film at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1065073/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm

References: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Deepak Soni

reasoning -Deepaknnl (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Deepak Soni is famouse president of Mair Kshatriya Swarnkar Sabha Narnaul Haryana.[reply]

TastyKhana

It is an unbiased page written with no advertorial content -Puneetsinghbangalore (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article was clearly promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment To Inspire Network Users

I, Etinu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Etinu (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)  Already done by JohnCD . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Email me the history

I need the history of this deleted page, to work on it and improve it. Please email the history to me.--Taranet (talk) 14:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - in fact, I have done better than that: as this was deleted by BLP-prod, I have restored it and reset the ten-day timer, so you have that long to add reliable sources to the article. JohnCD (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic

Paul venter was unaware that the the article had been PRODed and would have objected -Paul venter (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user TakuyaMurata (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alec Glassey.jpg

Please undelete to allow this image to be used for visual identification purposes of the subject in question as there is no other image of this deceased individual available.Graemp (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have reset the di-no-fair-use tag, which gives you seven days to add this to the article and provide an appropriate FUR - see Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BalletX

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 75.151.167.149 (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Post-Examiner

With a few edits, the significance of the newspaper will be demonstrated through multiple outside sources. I would have done this had I been aware article had been PRODded. -Perfect Orange Sphere (talk) 05:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/IPSOS

Inappropriate speedy deletion of what I presume to be a contribution of once-longtime contributors Coldmachine and Arthana who were unjustly accused of sockpuppetry back in 2007 and whose blocks have since been overturned by Jimbo & others. I am currently researching & reading past sockpuppetry cases, so it'd help if this particular case was undeleted even though it was back in 2007. As well, can the undeleting admin also check contributions from either Coldmachine or Arthana which were summarily deleted starting from 14 June 2007 so that they can also be reinstated? Thanks, -TeleComNasSprVen (talkcontribs) 08:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore the deleted version from 15 June 2007. TeleComNasSprVen (talkcontribs) 08:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Blackwell Forbes

Was deleted by proposed deletion with the reason "Fails WP:Notability. If there is something of note, can be integrated into Forbes family." But together with William Hemsley he described a couple of new plant species and is not mentioned in Forbes family for his botanical achievements. -- Olaf Studt (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC) -Olaf Studt (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nyttend (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

dr suresh pandey

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pranpat2005 (talk) 11:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people): you will need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Licence requirement in Gurgaon for property Dealing

Enter your reasoning it is by the law of Haryana -state under India ,so please dont delete the article

here and then click the "Save page" button below -Futureindia (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - the page has been deleted as a copyright violation from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/registration-of-property-dealers-in-haryana-reviewed/article2031186.ece. Wikipedia cannot accept copied material - please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Beckford

Deleted for no valid reason "Save page" button below -184.11.12.246 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Yankees10 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JetsterPack

This page was not create to advertise the blog, -Efrizzz (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - @Efrizzz: this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverly Hills Sports Council

I, Nyfan2007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Nyfan2007 (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Nyfan2007: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Galley Beggar

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) DiGriz sigil (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @DiGriz sigil: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Föreningen Sveriges Filmfotografer, FSF

I, 75.85.11.118, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 75.85.11.118 (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uche Unogu

Uche is an evangelist in the rnak of Reinhard Bonnke. He has over 30,000 twitter follows are a popular blog! -Ucheunogu (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done @Ucheunogu: Hey Ucheunogu. I assume this article was about yourself. Please read our pages on autobiographies and on editing with a conflict of interest. I personally would be utterly embarrassed to write an article about myself – to engage in such blatant self-aggrandizement.

Meanwhile, please note that having some threshold of Twitter followers or a popular blog are not bases for warranting an encyclopedia article. See our guideline on notability and our policy on verifiability to see some of what is. In short, though, if there aren't reliable, secondary sources completely independent of the subject that have written about the subject in detail and which can be used to support an article through citations, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic.

Regarding your request for undeletion, that cannot happen because the deleted article was a blatant copyright violation of this site. Note that if that is your writing, or you otherwise own the copyright, we still could not use it unless it was released under a free copyright license (not just for our use). Note that the content was not, in any event, written in a suitable encyclopedic style. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado_Swing

Sorry, I did not edit my page by the end of 2103 and would like to continue editing per your request for submission in 2014 Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Coloradoswing (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Enter your reasoning here "You automatically deleted page before I could finish editing in 2014" and then click the "Save page" button below -Coloradoswing (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Coloradoswing: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Iraqi propaganda under the Saddam Hussein regime

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Robertjalberts (talk) 23:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Robertjalberts: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob(Jake) Griffin

Future developments have occurred in this individuals life making it now worthy of a wiki page, prior to this there was no known reason for the page - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.226.213.233 (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please expand upon that. Tell us what has occurred, or much better yet, provide links or tell us about reliable sources that you think a notable and verifiable article might be base upon. The deleted article was a panegyric written in a first person voice indicating and evidencing little notability.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

<copied rant removed, see below> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakecash1 (talkcontribs) 03:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I have removed for copyright reasons a long rant against the notability policy, copied from this 2006 blog which is marked Copyright © 2006 Alan De Smet. It can be read there; it did nothing to answer the question above, and the deleted article gives no indication of notability. Jakecash1, if you are Jacob Griffin, please understand that this is not LinkedIn; read Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had archived the latest revision of the page in my sandbox, but it turns out not to be there.

Perhaps a slip of my save button.

I would be grateful if the last revision of the page could be userified somewhere, e.g., here >> User:VisitingPhilosopher/sandbox/Personal relationship skills

There are some paragraphs and REFs which I think are suitable to be included in other articles. Let me know if that is possible. Thanks. ♥ VisitingPhilosophertalkcontribs 03:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Text emailed. As this was deleted after WP:Articles for deletion/Personal relationship skills I am reluctant to userfy it without the agreement of the closing administrator, but I have emailed the text to you. Regarding using the material in other articles, that is certainly possible, but make sure you have read and understood WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 11:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I received the text by email. You state it might require other agreements, so I won't userfy it. It is just handy to have a few of the sentences for copy-paste. The individual paragraphs are all well-cited, and the entire article was in main space like that for about 18 months. It was the combination of all the paragraphs on one page which caused some objections over Christmas. Thanks again. ♥ VisitingPhilosophertalkcontribs 21:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PeopleWhoDoSh1t

Hello Wikipedia,

I'm writing this message to please make a second thought about keeping my wiki undeleted. My wiki had been reviewed by four others and finally accepted by Jinkinson. After noticing the "may have some issues" bar on the top of the screen, I realized that I could probably keep my wiki and therefore keep getting sources to add onto the site and progress little by little. Unfortunately, I was very disappointed to find out my wiki was deleted. We put in lots of time to gather information from verified writers to put in this wiki. Please make a last final honest judgement and let us know.

Regards, pwdswiki -Pwdswiki (talk) 03:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Your username suggests a conflict of interest, but in any case, sorry, but I see no indication that this Youtube series, whose episodes got a couple of hundred views at most, is anywhere near our WP:Notability standard, which requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (summary). Blogs don't count. JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Octopus Deploy

I, 123.243.177.9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 123.243.177.9 (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Red The White and The Blue

I, 5.81.168.188, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Album release delayed, will be out in April 2015 so need extension to add more relevant content.5.81.168.188 (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, though it seems a bit premature if the album is more than a year away. JohnCD (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Park Sojin

Who cares if the article is small. More information will be added to it later on. Give small things chances. Enough said. Thank you. -LeaaNaia (talk) 19:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: I see an article - it's not up for deletion, as far as I can see. What brings you here to request that it be undeleted? ES&L 19:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Kenneth_W._Morgan

Acme66 (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Magda hollander lafon

Koolkast (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tommy Hittz

I, MistyDawnTHP, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. MistyDawnTHP (talk) 02:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @MistyDawnTHP: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Town (Band)

The page was deleted by a A7 deletion, which is untrue as the band has multiple press citations, proving the notability of the page. The band has also released multiple recorded albums and is signed to a major record label and justify a wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmercuriadis (talkcontribs) 06:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Cindamuse (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. First, read WP:BAND and WP:Notability (summary) - references to the band's own pages, the label's pages, iTunes, Twitter etc do not count for notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PNM Alikkoya

I, Shamtk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Shamtk (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to verify what the article says and to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SDMS (Staff Development Management Software)

I, 62.249.233.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 62.249.233.146 (talk) 08:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph James, Producer and Actor

Josephjamesproducer (talk) 09:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert J. Saleh

I, 68.41.111.123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 68.41.111.123 (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Slow Dating

Panorman2 (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shannen Macleason

Does not appear notable after a web search? Since when my dear wikipedia became a facebook number of likes count instead of informations, after 2006 i quit my career to became a teacher, i hate brag, and i don't like anyone who brags, i don't like exposure to the point i only saw this today...

one of the 3 semifinalist of RFM/Pedro Abrunhosa contest (Portugal) http://pedro_abrunhosa.blogs.sapo.pt/60897.html

mention by Michael Cretu(Enigma) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUQKlq42GdM 1:33

At Berklee Valencia open night, with Sally Taylor and Livingstone Taylor, with my true name http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AczFUcjh7CU

released a EP with showcases at FNAC stores etc, was agenciated in Canada etc

Became a vocal teacher of some children and teenagers who entered in tv contests similar to idols http://morangoscomacucar.org/rouxinois-ja-sao-moranguitos/

That was the point of the deletion? Make people brag? I won't! It is ok for me if you have delete it, i don't minda at all, but shouldn't you just make your editors more awere, not all music revolves about facebook likes? Hope it will. Best to the wikipedia. Sincerily Shannen Macleason 79.169.233.245 (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandip Goswami

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sagnik Goswami (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)I created a page about Sandip Goswami who is Indian Bengali poet-author. The page is 100% original. I challenge strongly.[reply]